Re: [PATCH 4/4] uprobes/tracing: generalize structuprobe_trace_entry_head
From: Steven Rostedt
Date: Mon Apr 08 2013 - 11:55:42 EST
On Fri, 2013-03-29 at 19:15 +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> struct uprobe_trace_entry_head has a single member for reporting,
> "unsigned long ip". If we want to support uretprobes we need to
> create another struct which has "func" and "ret_ip" and duplicate
> a lot of functions, like trace_kprobe.c does.
>
> To avoid this copy-and-paste horror we turn ->ip into ->vaddr[]
> and add couple of trivial helpers to calculate sizeof/data. This
> uglifies the code a bit, but this allows us to avoid a lot more
> complications later, when we add the support for ret-probes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> kernel/trace/trace.h | 5 ---
> kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c | 61 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
> 2 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace.h b/kernel/trace/trace.h
> index 57d7e53..6ca57cf 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace.h
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace.h
> @@ -103,11 +103,6 @@ struct kretprobe_trace_entry_head {
> unsigned long ret_ip;
> };
>
> -struct uprobe_trace_entry_head {
> - struct trace_entry ent;
> - unsigned long ip;
> -};
> -
> /*
> * trace_flag_type is an enumeration that holds different
> * states when a trace occurs. These are:
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c b/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c
> index 43d258d..92a4b08 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c
> @@ -28,6 +28,17 @@
>
> #define UPROBE_EVENT_SYSTEM "uprobes"
>
> +struct uprobe_trace_entry_head {
> + struct trace_entry ent;
> + unsigned long vaddr[];
> +};
> +
> +#define SIZEOF_TRACE_ENTRY(nr) \
> + (sizeof(struct uprobe_trace_entry_head) + sizeof(unsigned long) * (nr))
> +
> +#define DATAOF_TRACE_ENTRY(entry, nr) \
> + ((void*)&(entry)->vaddr[nr])
> +
> struct trace_uprobe_filter {
> rwlock_t rwlock;
> int nr_systemwide;
> @@ -491,20 +502,19 @@ static int uprobe_trace_func(struct trace_uprobe *tu, struct pt_regs *regs)
> struct uprobe_trace_entry_head *entry;
> struct ring_buffer_event *event;
> struct ring_buffer *buffer;
> - u8 *data;
> + void *data;
> int size, i;
> struct ftrace_event_call *call = &tu->call;
>
> - size = sizeof(*entry) + tu->size;
> -
> + size = SIZEOF_TRACE_ENTRY(1) + tu->size;
That '1' is confusing. When I first looked at this code, I thought it
was a bug as it should have been '0' (thinking of arrays). And then I
realized that you want the entry *after* the element.
Instead of '1' and I assume '2' for ret probes, how about defining an
enum:
enum {
UPROBE_NORM = 1,
UPROBE_RET = 2,
};
and then you can have;
size = SIZEOF_TRACE_ENTRY(UPROBE_NORM);
and later:
size = SIZEOF_TRACE_ENTRY(UPROBE_RET);
Same goes for DATAOF_TRACE_ENTRY().
This would make it a lot easier to understand and review, and much less
bug prone when we have to deal with two different types of
uprobe_trace_entry_head's.
-- Steve
> event = trace_current_buffer_lock_reserve(&buffer, call->event.type,
> size, 0, 0);
> if (!event)
> return 0;
>
> entry = ring_buffer_event_data(event);
> - entry->ip = instruction_pointer(regs);
> - data = (u8 *)&entry[1];
> + entry->vaddr[0] = instruction_pointer(regs);
> + data = DATAOF_TRACE_ENTRY(entry, 1);
> for (i = 0; i < tu->nr_args; i++)
> call_fetch(&tu->args[i].fetch, regs, data + tu->args[i].offset);
>
> @@ -518,22 +528,22 @@ static int uprobe_trace_func(struct trace_uprobe *tu, struct pt_regs *regs)
> static enum print_line_t
> print_uprobe_event(struct trace_iterator *iter, int flags, struct trace_event *event)
> {
> - struct uprobe_trace_entry_head *field;
> + struct uprobe_trace_entry_head *entry;
> struct trace_seq *s = &iter->seq;
> struct trace_uprobe *tu;
> u8 *data;
> int i;
>
> - field = (struct uprobe_trace_entry_head *)iter->ent;
> + entry = (struct uprobe_trace_entry_head *)iter->ent;
> tu = container_of(event, struct trace_uprobe, call.event);
>
> - if (!trace_seq_printf(s, "%s: (0x%lx)", tu->call.name, field->ip))
> + if (!trace_seq_printf(s, "%s: (0x%lx)", tu->call.name, entry->vaddr[0]))
> goto partial;
>
> - data = (u8 *)&field[1];
> + data = DATAOF_TRACE_ENTRY(entry, 1);
> for (i = 0; i < tu->nr_args; i++) {
> if (!tu->args[i].type->print(s, tu->args[i].name,
> - data + tu->args[i].offset, field))
> + data + tu->args[i].offset, entry))
> goto partial;
> }
>
> @@ -585,16 +595,17 @@ static void probe_event_disable(struct trace_uprobe *tu, int flag)
>
> static int uprobe_event_define_fields(struct ftrace_event_call *event_call)
> {
> - int ret, i;
> + int ret, i, size;
> struct uprobe_trace_entry_head field;
> - struct trace_uprobe *tu = (struct trace_uprobe *)event_call->data;
> + struct trace_uprobe *tu = event_call->data;
>
> - DEFINE_FIELD(unsigned long, ip, FIELD_STRING_IP, 0);
> + DEFINE_FIELD(unsigned long, vaddr[0], FIELD_STRING_IP, 0);
> + size = SIZEOF_TRACE_ENTRY(1);
> /* Set argument names as fields */
> for (i = 0; i < tu->nr_args; i++) {
> ret = trace_define_field(event_call, tu->args[i].type->fmttype,
> tu->args[i].name,
> - sizeof(field) + tu->args[i].offset,
> + size + tu->args[i].offset,
> tu->args[i].type->size,
> tu->args[i].type->is_signed,
> FILTER_OTHER);
> @@ -748,33 +759,31 @@ static int uprobe_perf_func(struct trace_uprobe *tu, struct pt_regs *regs)
> struct ftrace_event_call *call = &tu->call;
> struct uprobe_trace_entry_head *entry;
> struct hlist_head *head;
> - u8 *data;
> - int size, __size, i;
> - int rctx;
> + unsigned long ip;
> + void *data;
> + int size, rctx, i;
>
> if (!uprobe_perf_filter(&tu->consumer, 0, current->mm))
> return UPROBE_HANDLER_REMOVE;
>
> - __size = sizeof(*entry) + tu->size;
> - size = ALIGN(__size + sizeof(u32), sizeof(u64));
> - size -= sizeof(u32);
> + size = SIZEOF_TRACE_ENTRY(1);
> + size = ALIGN(size + tu->size + sizeof(u32), sizeof(u64)) - sizeof(u32);
> if (WARN_ONCE(size > PERF_MAX_TRACE_SIZE, "profile buffer not large enough"))
> return 0;
>
> preempt_disable();
> -
> entry = perf_trace_buf_prepare(size, call->event.type, regs, &rctx);
> if (!entry)
> goto out;
>
> - entry->ip = instruction_pointer(regs);
> - data = (u8 *)&entry[1];
> + ip = instruction_pointer(regs);
> + entry->vaddr[0] = ip;
> + data = DATAOF_TRACE_ENTRY(entry, 1);
> for (i = 0; i < tu->nr_args; i++)
> call_fetch(&tu->args[i].fetch, regs, data + tu->args[i].offset);
>
> head = this_cpu_ptr(call->perf_events);
> - perf_trace_buf_submit(entry, size, rctx, entry->ip, 1, regs, head, NULL);
> -
> + perf_trace_buf_submit(entry, size, rctx, ip, 1, regs, head, NULL);
> out:
> preempt_enable();
> return 0;
> @@ -784,7 +793,7 @@ static int uprobe_perf_func(struct trace_uprobe *tu, struct pt_regs *regs)
> static
> int trace_uprobe_register(struct ftrace_event_call *event, enum trace_reg type, void *data)
> {
> - struct trace_uprobe *tu = (struct trace_uprobe *)event->data;
> + struct trace_uprobe *tu = event->data;
>
> switch (type) {
> case TRACE_REG_REGISTER:
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/