Re: [PATCH] sparc: Use generic idle loop

[David Miller]

From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2013 19:10:35 +0200

> I think not.
> local_irq_disable writes 0 to the PIL register,
> whereas the above code set the IE (Interrupt enable) bit to 0.
> 
> So the implementations differs - and I think there is a good
> reason for being so.
> 
> But this is the part where I refer to that I am fooling around
> in code that I do not understand.
> I re-checked the SPARC V9 manual - but I did not within a few minutes
> reading understand what is the difference between the twoo.

Device interrupts arrive first as high-priority interrupt packets
that are serviced by traps which are enabled only if PSTATE.IE is
set.

These trap handlers reschedule the interrupt quickly into a PIL
levelled interrupt, whose delivery is covered by (%pil & PSTATE.IE)

The sun4v sleeping code requires that we have PSTATE.IE clear over
the cpu sleep hypervisor call.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/