Re: [4/7] i2c-designware: use dynamic adapter numbering on Lynxpoint

[Mika Westerberg]

On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 11:29:24AM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 12:23:19PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 11:06:05AM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > > On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 02:09:57AM -0000, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> > > > It is not good idea to mix static and dynamic I2C adapter numbering. In
> > > > this particular case on Lynxpoint we had graphics I2C adapter which took
> > > > the first numbers preventing the designware I2C driver from using the
> > > > adapter numbers it preferred.
> > > > 
> > > > Fix this by switching to use dynamic adapter numbering on Intel Lynxpoint.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > 
> > > I am fearing regressions here if the bus numbering changes.
> > 
> > There are no users for this dynamic numbering yet since it was introduced
> > with the Lynxpoint support.
> 
> Please add this to the commit msg.

Sure, thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/