Re: [PATCH v4] cpufreq: powerpc: Add cpufreq driver for Freescalee500mc SoCs

From: Viresh Kumar
Date: Tue Apr 09 2013 - 05:47:19 EST


Mostly good now, V5 should be the final one.

On 9 April 2013 14:02, <Yuantian.Tang@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/ppc-corenet-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/ppc-corenet-cpufreq.c

> +static int corenet_cpufreq_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
> + unsigned int target_freq, unsigned int relation)
> +{
> + struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
> + unsigned int new;
> + struct clk *parent;
> + int ret;
> + struct cpu_data *data = per_cpu(cpu_data, policy->cpu);
> +
> + cpufreq_frequency_table_target(policy, data->table,
> + target_freq, relation, &new);
> +
> + if (policy->cur == data->table[new].frequency)
> + return 0;
> +
> + freqs.old = policy->cur;
> + freqs.new = data->table[new].frequency;
> + freqs.cpu = policy->cpu;

You don't need to set freqs.cpu..

> + mutex_lock(&cpufreq_lock);
> + cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
> +
> + parent = of_clk_get(data->parent, new);
> + ret = clk_set_parent(data->clk, parent);
> + if (ret) {
> + freqs.new = freqs.old;
> + cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
> + mutex_unlock(&cpufreq_lock);
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
> + mutex_unlock(&cpufreq_lock);

What about writing it as:

+ ret = clk_set_parent(data->clk, parent);
+ if (ret)
+ freqs.new = freqs.old;
+
+ cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
+ mutex_unlock(&cpufreq_lock);

return ret;

> + return 0;
> +}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/