Re: [PATCH RFC] rtc: rtc-s3c: use clk_prepare_enable and clk_disable_unprepare
From: Vivek Gautam
Date: Tue Apr 09 2013 - 08:51:26 EST
Hi Sylwester,
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 3:39 PM, Sylwester Nawrocki
<s.nawrocki@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 04/09/2013 11:45 AM, Vivek Gautam wrote:
>> Convert clk_enable/clk_disable to clk_prepare_enable/clk_disable_unprepare
>> calls as required by common clock framework, to get rid of
>> WARN_ON on prepare_count.
>
> Hmm, do you think warnings like below are any better that WARN_ON() on wrong
> clock's prepare_count value ? :)
>
>> Signed-off-by: Vivek Gautam <gautam.vivek@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>
>> This fixes the warnings in the boot log coming out of enabling
>> the common clock framework in exynos platform.
>>
>> However, on doing system suspend/resume using rtc wake mechanism
>> we still get following warning dump for the first time we suspend
>> using commands:
>> echo +10 > /sys/class/rtc/rtc0/wakealarm
>> echo mem > /sys/power/state
>>
>> [ 12.530000] ------------[ cut here ]------------
>> [ 12.530000] WARNING: at kernel/mutex.c:199 __mutex_lock_slowpath+0x2c0/0x340()
>> [ 12.530000] Modules linked in:
>> [ 12.530000] [<80014c60>] (unwind_backtrace+0x0/0xf8) from [<8001ebd0>] (warn_slowpath_common+0x54/0x68)
>> [ 12.530000] [<8001ebd0>] (warn_slowpath_common+0x54/0x68) from [<8001ec00>] (warn_slowpath_null+0x1c/0x24)
>> [ 12.530000] [<8001ec00>] (warn_slowpath_null+0x1c/0x24) from [<8033f548>] (__mutex_lock_slowpath+0x2c0/0x340)
>> [ 12.530000] [<8033f548>] (__mutex_lock_slowpath+0x2c0/0x340) from [<8033f5d4>] (mutex_lock+0xc/0x24)
>> [ 12.530000] [<8033f5d4>] (mutex_lock+0xc/0x24) from [<80299e18>] (clk_prepare+0x18/0x34)
>> [ 12.530000] [<80299e18>] (clk_prepare+0x18/0x34) from [<802862d8>] (s3c_rtc_alarmirq+0x1c/0x98)
>> [ 12.530000] [<802862d8>] (s3c_rtc_alarmirq+0x1c/0x98) from [<8006ad78>] (handle_irq_event_percpu+0x54/0x194)
>> [ 12.530000] [<8006ad78>] (handle_irq_event_percpu+0x54/0x194) from [<8006aef4>] (handle_irq_event+0x3c/0x5c)
>> [ 12.530000] [<8006aef4>] (handle_irq_event+0x3c/0x5c) from [<8006db00>] (handle_fasteoi_irq+0xa4/0x134)
>> [ 12.530000] [<8006db00>] (handle_fasteoi_irq+0xa4/0x134) from [<8006a594>] (generic_handle_irq+0x30/0x40)
>> [ 12.530000] [<8006a594>] (generic_handle_irq+0x30/0x40) from [<8000f4fc>] (handle_IRQ+0x40/0x90)
>> [ 12.530000] [<8000f4fc>] (handle_IRQ+0x40/0x90) from [<80008544>] (gic_handle_irq+0x38/0x68)
>> [ 12.530000] [<80008544>] (gic_handle_irq+0x38/0x68) from [<8000e200>] (__irq_svc+0x40/0x70)
>> [ 12.530000] Exception stack(0x8182be60 to 0x8182bea8)
>> [ 12.530000] be60: 00000000 00000000 0000000c ffffffff 60000013 8049fc50 00000000 80479a10
>> [ 12.530000] be80: 60000013 ee97de98 804799c0 00000001 0000000d 8182bea8 803412dc 803412e0
>> [ 12.530000] bea0: 60000013 ffffffff
>> [ 12.530000] [<8000e200>] (__irq_svc+0x40/0x70) from [<803412e0>] (_raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x10/0x38)
>> [ 12.530000] [<803412e0>] (_raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x10/0x38) from [<80070bc4>] (resume_irqs+0x9c/0xb8)
>> [ 12.530000] [<80070bc4>] (resume_irqs+0x9c/0xb8) from [<8021d528>] (dpm_resume_start+0xc/0x18)
>> [ 12.530000] [<8021d528>] (dpm_resume_start+0xc/0x18) from [<800544ac>] (suspend_devices_and_enter+0x118/0x2e4)
>> [ 12.530000] [<800544ac>] (suspend_devices_and_enter+0x118/0x2e4) from [<80054814>] (pm_suspend+0x19c/0x214)
>> [ 12.530000] [<80054814>] (pm_suspend+0x19c/0x214) from [<80053a58>] (state_store+0x120/0x12c)
>> [ 12.530000] [<80053a58>] (state_store+0x120/0x12c) from [<801ae9d8>] (kobj_attr_store+0x14/0x20)
>> [ 12.530000] [<801ae9d8>] (kobj_attr_store+0x14/0x20) from [<801092c8>] (sysfs_write_file+0xfc/0x17c)
>> [ 12.530000] [<801092c8>] (sysfs_write_file+0xfc/0x17c) from [<800b0d84>] (vfs_write+0xa8/0x138)
>> [ 12.530000] [<800b0d84>] (vfs_write+0xa8/0x138) from [<800b10e4>] (sys_write+0x40/0x68)
>> [ 12.530000] [<800b10e4>] (sys_write+0x40/0x68) from [<8000e600>] (ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x30)
>> [ 12.530000] ---[ end trace 8643216fba2e8cb5 ]---
>>
>> drivers/rtc/rtc-s3c.c | 58 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
>> 1 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-s3c.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-s3c.c
>> index fb994e9..75637ad 100644
>> --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-s3c.c
>> +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-s3c.c
>> @@ -65,12 +65,12 @@ static void s3c_rtc_alarm_clk_enable(bool enable)
>> spin_lock_irqsave(&s3c_rtc_alarm_clk_lock, irq_flags);
>> if (enable) {
>> if (!alarm_clk_enabled) {
>> - clk_enable(rtc_clk);
>> + clk_prepare_enable(rtc_clk);
>> alarm_clk_enabled = true;
>> }
>> } else {
>> if (alarm_clk_enabled) {
>> - clk_disable(rtc_clk);
>> + clk_disable_unprepare(rtc_clk);
>> alarm_clk_enabled = false;
>> }
>> }
>> @@ -83,13 +83,13 @@ static irqreturn_t s3c_rtc_alarmirq(int irq, void *id)
>> {
>> struct rtc_device *rdev = id;
>>
>> - clk_enable(rtc_clk);
>> + clk_prepare_enable(rtc_clk);
>
> The reason for the above failure is that clk_prepare is called from an interrupt
> context. You are not supposed to use clk_prepare_enable()/clk_unprepare_disble()
> like this. Instead, prepare the clock in s3c_rtc_probe() and unprepare in the
> driver's remove() callback. And clk_enable()/clk_disable calls could stay untouched.
Aah !! actually missed a similar patch from Thomas Abraham :(
doing the same as suggested by you.
Its available at:
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/188687/
>
>> rtc_update_irq(rdev, 1, RTC_AF | RTC_IRQF);
>>
>> if (s3c_rtc_cpu_type == TYPE_S3C64XX)
>> writeb(S3C2410_INTP_ALM, s3c_rtc_base + S3C2410_INTP);
>>
>> - clk_disable(rtc_clk);
>> + clk_disable_unprepare(rtc_clk);
>>
>> s3c_rtc_alarm_clk_enable(false);
>>
>> @@ -100,13 +100,13 @@ static irqreturn_t s3c_rtc_tickirq(int irq, void *id)
>> {
>> struct rtc_device *rdev = id;
>>
>> - clk_enable(rtc_clk);
>> + clk_prepare_enable(rtc_clk);
>> rtc_update_irq(rdev, 1, RTC_PF | RTC_IRQF);
>>
>> if (s3c_rtc_cpu_type == TYPE_S3C64XX)
>> writeb(S3C2410_INTP_TIC, s3c_rtc_base + S3C2410_INTP);
>>
>> - clk_disable(rtc_clk);
>> + clk_disable_unprepare(rtc_clk);
>> return IRQ_HANDLED;
>> }
>
--
Thanks & Regards
Vivek
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/