Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/2] ARM: OMAP4: clock: Add device tree supportfor AUXCLKs
From: Tony Lindgren
Date: Tue Apr 09 2013 - 13:43:29 EST
* Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> [130409 09:54]:
> * Roger Quadros <rogerq@xxxxxx> [130409 03:00]:
> > On 04/05/2013 06:58 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > >
> > > Can't you just use the clock name there to get it?
> >
> > In device tree we don't pass around clock names. You can either get
> > a phandle or an index to the clock.
> >
> > e.g. Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/imx31-clock.txt
>
> Yes I understand that. But the driver/clock/omap driver can just
> remap the DT device initially so the board specific clock is
> found from the clock alias table. Basically initially a passthrough
> driver that can be enhanced to parse DT clock bindings and load
> data from /lib/firmware.
Actually probably the driver/clock/omap can even do even less
initially. There probably even no need to remap clocks there.
As long as the DT clock driver understands that a board specific
auxclk is specified in the DT it can just call clk_add_alias() so
the driver will get the right auxclk from cclock44xx_data.c.
Then other features can be added later on like to allocate a
clock entirely based on the binding etc.
Regards,
Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/