Re: [PATCH 2/7] sched: Update rq clock on nohz CPU before settingfair group shares

[Ingo Molnar]

* Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Wed, 2013-04-10 at 13:06 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> > There's just a handful of high level entry points, right? schedule(), wakeup, 
> > scheduler tick, maybe notifiers - anything else? 
> 
> I suppose there's some cgroup muck and the various system calls; most
> of them should be covered if we take some lower level primitives or so.
> 
> We could 'simply' hijack rq->lock and clear the state every time we
> acquire or release it.. maybe have an exemption for the balance double
> lock ops.

That would be feasible ...

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/