Re: [PATCHSET] perf, cgroup: implement hierarchy support forperf_event controller

[Tejun Heo]

Hello,

On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 11:37:55AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> Yeah - at least for larger changes that's a good workflow.
> 
> For smaller changes we can pick one or the other tree. Tejun, do these changes 
> create any conflicts with the current tip:master tree? If not then you could carry 
> these changes in your tree. If there's significant conflicts then it might be 
> better to rebase this on top of perf/core and pull them into perf/core. (assuming 
> there's no other cgroups prereq patches beyond the ones in this series.)

The only conflict is a trivial #include one in
include/linux/res_counter.h which is unrelated to this series.  I'll
commit these to cgroup/for-3.10.

Thanks!

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/