Re: [PATCH UPDATED 1/7] x86: don't show trace into stacktracemachinery
From: Tejun Heo
Date: Wed Apr 10 2013 - 17:09:27 EST
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 10:22:20PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> This is double negation and is generally wrong in English. I think you
> want to say:
>
> "%pf specified neither frame nor regs for ..."
>
> or
>
> "%pf didn't specify either frame or regs for ..."
>
> Or maybe even passive and shorter:
>
> "%pf: No frame or regs specified for %%current."
>
> and so on.
Crap, right, will post an updated version soon.
Thanks!
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/