Re: [rtc-linux] Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] ARM: at91: fix hanged boot
From: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
Date: Thu Apr 11 2013 - 14:52:23 EST
On 17:55 Thu 11 Apr , Johan Hovold wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 07:07:54PM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > These patches fix a few severe issues affecting most AT91 SOCs where
> > boot can hang after a non-general reset, and where the only way to get
> > the system booting again is to do a general reset -- something which
> > could require physically removing any backup battery.
>
> Have you had time to look at these patches yet, Nicolas?
>
> I don't think not having decided on the path forward for DT-support for
> rtc-at91sam9 needs to be a blocker. The rtt-nodes will be needed in any
> case.
>
> I could respin the series on top of the DT-patch for rtc-at91rm9200, and
> add interrupt and status-disabled properties to the DT-nodes as well.
for this this is still a no go
this way too much ugly
Best Regards,
J.
>
> Thanks,
> Johan
>
> > The problems stem from the fact that the RTC and RTT-peripherals are
> > powered by backup power (VDDBU) and are not reset on wake-up, user,
> > watchdog or software reset. Consequently, RTC and RTT-alarms and their
> > interrupts may be enabled at boot, leading to a system lock-up when an
> > interrupt arrives on the shared system-interrupt line before the
> > appropriate handler (e.g. RTC-driver) has been installed.
> >
> > The easiest way to trigger this is to simply wake up from an RTC-alarm
> > on at91sam9g45. The RTC-driver currently does not disable interrupts at
> > shutdown so even after a clean shut-down the system will always hang
> > after waking up.
> >
> > The first patch fixes this very general case of RTC-wake up after a
> > clean shutdown in the RTC-driver and is marked for stable as it is
> > perfectly straight-forward. [ Note that the other, RTT-based, AT91
> > RTC-driver already disables its interrupts at shutdown. ]
> >
> > The more general problem can be triggered, for example, by doing a
> > user-reset while updating the RTC-time or if an RTC or RTT-alarm goes
> > off after a non-clean shutdown.
> >
> > To fix this I propose that arch-code should mask the relevant interrupts
> > before enabling the system interrupt at early boot, and this is what
> > the fifth patch does. To access the RTC-registers I choose to revert a
> > recent patch that moved the register definitions to drivers/rtc.
> >
> > Arguably, the relevant interrupts could also be disabled in bootloaders,
> > but I suggest fixing it in the kernel once and for all.
> >
> > The patches have been tested on at91sam9263 and at91sam9g45 (non-DT),
> > and compile-tested for the other SOCs and DT.
> >
> > Johan
> >
> >
> > v2:
> > - add DT-support
> > - make sys_irq_mask non-mandatory
> >
> >
> > Johan Hovold (5):
> > ARM: at91/rtc: fix boot after RTC wake-up
> > ARM: at91/dts: add RTC nodes
> > ARM: at91/dts: add RTT nodes
> > Revert "arm: at91: move at91rm9200 rtc header in drivers/rtc"
> > ARM: at91: fix hanged boot
>
> --
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to "rtc-linux".
> Membership options at http://groups.google.com/group/rtc-linux .
> Please read http://groups.google.com/group/rtc-linux/web/checklist
> before submitting a driver.
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "rtc-linux" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rtc-linux+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/