[PATCH v4 21/22] x86, mm: Make init_mem_mapping be able to be called several times
From: Yinghai Lu
Date: Thu Apr 11 2013 - 21:00:36 EST
- Next message: Yinghai Lu: "[PATCH v4 17/22] x86, ACPI, numa, ia64: split SLIT handling out"
- Previous message: Yinghai Lu: "[PATCH v4 13/22] x86, mm, numa: Use numa_meminfo to check node_map_pfn alignment"
- In reply to: Yinghai Lu: "[PATCH v4 13/22] x86, mm, numa: Use numa_meminfo to check node_map_pfn alignment"
- Next in thread: Yinghai Lu: "[PATCH v4 17/22] x86, ACPI, numa, ia64: split SLIT handling out"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Prepare to put page table on local nodes.
Move calling of init_mem_mapping to early_initmem_init.
Rework alloc_low_pages to alloc page table in following order:
BRK, local node, low range
Still only load_cr3 one time, otherwise we would break xen 64bit again.
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Jacob Shin <jacob.shin@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h | 2 +-
arch/x86/kernel/setup.c | 1 -
arch/x86/mm/init.c | 88 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
arch/x86/mm/numa.c | 24 ++++++++++++
4 files changed, 79 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h
index 1e67223..868687c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h
@@ -621,7 +621,7 @@ static inline int pgd_none(pgd_t pgd)
#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
extern int direct_gbpages;
-void init_mem_mapping(void);
+void init_mem_mapping(unsigned long begin, unsigned long end);
void early_alloc_pgt_buf(void);
/* local pte updates need not use xchg for locking */
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
index 6ef3fa2..67ef4bc 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
@@ -1105,7 +1105,6 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
acpi_boot_table_init();
early_acpi_boot_init();
early_initmem_init();
- init_mem_mapping();
memblock.current_limit = get_max_mapped();
early_trap_pf_init();
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/init.c b/arch/x86/mm/init.c
index 2754e45..8a03283 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/init.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/init.c
@@ -24,7 +24,10 @@ static unsigned long __initdata pgt_buf_start;
static unsigned long __initdata pgt_buf_end;
static unsigned long __initdata pgt_buf_top;
-static unsigned long min_pfn_mapped;
+static unsigned long low_min_pfn_mapped;
+static unsigned long low_max_pfn_mapped;
+static unsigned long local_min_pfn_mapped;
+static unsigned long local_max_pfn_mapped;
static bool __initdata can_use_brk_pgt = true;
@@ -52,10 +55,17 @@ __ref void *alloc_low_pages(unsigned int num)
if ((pgt_buf_end + num) > pgt_buf_top || !can_use_brk_pgt) {
unsigned long ret;
- if (min_pfn_mapped >= max_pfn_mapped)
- panic("alloc_low_page: ran out of memory");
- ret = memblock_find_in_range(min_pfn_mapped << PAGE_SHIFT,
- max_pfn_mapped << PAGE_SHIFT,
+ if (local_min_pfn_mapped >= local_max_pfn_mapped) {
+ if (low_min_pfn_mapped >= low_max_pfn_mapped)
+ panic("alloc_low_page: ran out of memory");
+ ret = memblock_find_in_range(
+ low_min_pfn_mapped << PAGE_SHIFT,
+ low_max_pfn_mapped << PAGE_SHIFT,
+ PAGE_SIZE * num , PAGE_SIZE);
+ } else
+ ret = memblock_find_in_range(
+ local_min_pfn_mapped << PAGE_SHIFT,
+ local_max_pfn_mapped << PAGE_SHIFT,
PAGE_SIZE * num , PAGE_SIZE);
if (!ret)
panic("alloc_low_page: can not alloc memory");
@@ -402,60 +412,75 @@ static unsigned long __init get_new_step_size(unsigned long step_size)
return step_size;
}
-void __init init_mem_mapping(void)
+void __init init_mem_mapping(unsigned long begin, unsigned long end)
{
- unsigned long end, real_end, start, last_start;
+ unsigned long real_end, start, last_start;
unsigned long step_size;
unsigned long addr;
unsigned long mapped_ram_size = 0;
unsigned long new_mapped_ram_size;
+ bool is_low = false;
+
+ if (!begin) {
+ probe_page_size_mask();
+ /* the ISA range is always mapped regardless of memory holes */
+ init_memory_mapping(0, ISA_END_ADDRESS);
+ begin = ISA_END_ADDRESS;
+ is_low = true;
+ }
- probe_page_size_mask();
-
-#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
- end = max_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT;
-#else
- end = max_low_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT;
-#endif
-
- /* the ISA range is always mapped regardless of memory holes */
- init_memory_mapping(0, ISA_END_ADDRESS);
+ if (begin >= end)
+ return;
/* xen has big range in reserved near end of ram, skip it at first.*/
- addr = memblock_find_in_range(ISA_END_ADDRESS, end, PMD_SIZE, PMD_SIZE);
+ addr = memblock_find_in_range(begin, end, PMD_SIZE, PMD_SIZE);
real_end = addr + PMD_SIZE;
/* step_size need to be small so pgt_buf from BRK could cover it */
step_size = PMD_SIZE;
- max_pfn_mapped = 0; /* will get exact value next */
- min_pfn_mapped = real_end >> PAGE_SHIFT;
+ local_max_pfn_mapped = begin >> PAGE_SHIFT;
+ local_min_pfn_mapped = real_end >> PAGE_SHIFT;
last_start = start = real_end;
- while (last_start > ISA_END_ADDRESS) {
+ while (last_start > begin) {
if (last_start > step_size) {
start = round_down(last_start - 1, step_size);
- if (start < ISA_END_ADDRESS)
- start = ISA_END_ADDRESS;
+ if (start < begin)
+ start = begin;
} else
- start = ISA_END_ADDRESS;
+ start = begin;
new_mapped_ram_size = init_range_memory_mapping(start,
last_start);
+ if ((last_start >> PAGE_SHIFT) > local_max_pfn_mapped)
+ local_max_pfn_mapped = last_start >> PAGE_SHIFT;
+ local_min_pfn_mapped = start >> PAGE_SHIFT;
last_start = start;
- min_pfn_mapped = last_start >> PAGE_SHIFT;
/* only increase step_size after big range get mapped */
if (new_mapped_ram_size > mapped_ram_size)
step_size = get_new_step_size(step_size);
mapped_ram_size += new_mapped_ram_size;
}
- if (real_end < end)
+ if (real_end < end) {
init_range_memory_mapping(real_end, end);
+ if ((end >> PAGE_SHIFT) > local_max_pfn_mapped)
+ local_max_pfn_mapped = end >> PAGE_SHIFT;
+ }
+ if (is_low) {
+ low_min_pfn_mapped = local_min_pfn_mapped;
+ low_max_pfn_mapped = local_max_pfn_mapped;
+ }
+}
+
+#ifndef CONFIG_NUMA
+void __init early_initmem_init(void)
+{
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
- if (max_pfn > max_low_pfn) {
- /* can we preseve max_low_pfn ?*/
+ init_mem_mapping(0, max_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT);
+ if (max_pfn > max_low_pfn)
max_low_pfn = max_pfn;
- }
#else
+ init_mem_mapping(0, max_low_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT);
early_ioremap_page_table_range_init();
#endif
@@ -464,11 +489,6 @@ void __init init_mem_mapping(void)
early_memtest(0, max_pfn_mapped << PAGE_SHIFT);
}
-
-#ifndef CONFIG_NUMA
-void __init early_initmem_init(void)
-{
-}
#endif
/*
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
index c2d4653..d3eb0c9 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
@@ -17,8 +17,10 @@
#include <asm/dma.h>
#include <asm/acpi.h>
#include <asm/amd_nb.h>
+#include <asm/tlbflush.h>
#include "numa_internal.h"
+#include "mm_internal.h"
int __initdata numa_off;
nodemask_t numa_nodes_parsed __initdata;
@@ -668,9 +670,31 @@ static void __init early_x86_numa_init(void)
numa_init(dummy_numa_init);
}
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
+static void __init early_x86_numa_init_mapping(void)
+{
+ init_mem_mapping(0, max_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT);
+ if (max_pfn > max_low_pfn)
+ max_low_pfn = max_pfn;
+}
+#else
+static void __init early_x86_numa_init_mapping(void)
+{
+ init_mem_mapping(0, max_low_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT);
+ early_ioremap_page_table_range_init();
+}
+#endif
+
void __init early_initmem_init(void)
{
early_x86_numa_init();
+
+ early_x86_numa_init_mapping();
+
+ load_cr3(swapper_pg_dir);
+ __flush_tlb_all();
+
+ early_memtest(0, max_pfn_mapped<<PAGE_SHIFT);
}
void __init x86_numa_init(void)
--
1.8.1.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Next message: Yinghai Lu: "[PATCH v4 17/22] x86, ACPI, numa, ia64: split SLIT handling out"
- Previous message: Yinghai Lu: "[PATCH v4 13/22] x86, mm, numa: Use numa_meminfo to check node_map_pfn alignment"
- In reply to: Yinghai Lu: "[PATCH v4 13/22] x86, mm, numa: Use numa_meminfo to check node_map_pfn alignment"
- Next in thread: Yinghai Lu: "[PATCH v4 17/22] x86, ACPI, numa, ia64: split SLIT handling out"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]