Re: Excessive stall times on ext4 in 3.9-rc2
From: Mel Gorman
Date: Fri Apr 12 2013 - 05:47:41 EST
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 10:57:08PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 11:33:35PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> > I think it might be more enlightening if Mel traced which process in
> > which funclion is holding the buffer lock. I suspect we'll find out that
> > the flusher thread has submitted the buffer for IO as an async write and
> > thus it takes a long time to complete in presence of reads which have
> > higher priority.
>
> That's an interesting theory. If the workload is one which is very
> heavy on reads and writes, that could explain the high latency. That
> would explain why those of us who are using primarily SSD's are seeing
> the problems, because would be reads are nice and fast.
>
> If that is the case, one possible solution that comes to mind would be
> to mark buffer_heads that contain metadata with a flag, so that the
> flusher thread can write them back at the same priority as reads.
>
> The only problem I can see with this hypothesis is that if this is the
> explanation for what Mel and Jiri are seeing, it's something that
> would have been around for a long time, and would affect ext3 as well
> as ext4. That isn't quite consistent, however, with Mel's observation
> that this is a probablem which has gotten worse in relatively
> recently.
>
According to the tests I've run, multi-second stalls have been a problem for
a while but never really bothered me. I'm not sure why it felt particularly
bad around -rc2 or why it seems to be better now. Maybe I just had my
cranky pants on.
--
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/