3.9-rc5: Encountedred INFO: rcu_sched self-detected stall on CPU dueto 09a9f1d27
From: Vivek Goyal
Date: Fri Apr 12 2013 - 14:14:07 EST
Hi,
I am writing some code where I lock down a process memory at exec() time.
My patches were working fine till 3.9-rc4 and suddendly things broke down
in 3.9-rc5.
Whenever I tried to exec() a process with memory locked down, my bash
session hangs and after a while I get following warning.
login: [ 174.669002] INFO: rcu_sched self-detected stall on CPU { 2} (t=60000 jiffies g=2580 c=2579 q=1085)
[ 174.669002] Pid: 4894, comm: kexec Not tainted 3.9.0-rc6+ #243
[ 174.669002] Call Trace:
[ 174.669002] <IRQ> [<ffffffff810c413a>] rcu_check_callbacks+0x21a/0x760
[ 174.669002] [<ffffffff810c7c0c>] ? acct_account_cputime+0x1c/0x20
[ 174.669002] [<ffffffff8104fd08>] update_process_times+0x48/0x80
[ 174.669002] [<ffffffff810913dd>] tick_sched_handle+0x3d/0x50
[ 174.669002] [<ffffffff810915e5>] tick_sched_timer+0x45/0x70
[ 174.669002] [<ffffffff81066951>] __run_hrtimer+0x81/0x220
[ 174.669002] [<ffffffff810915a0>] ? tick_nohz_handler+0xa0/0xa0
[ 174.669002] [<ffffffff8108ae0c>] ? ktime_get_update_offsets+0x4c/0xd0
[ 174.669002] [<ffffffff81067297>] hrtimer_interrupt+0xf7/0x250
[ 174.669002] [<ffffffff81886739>] smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x69/0x99
[ 174.669002] [<ffffffff818859ca>] apic_timer_interrupt+0x6a/0x70
[ 174.669002] <EOI> [<ffffffff8111e557>] ? __mlock_vma_pages_range+0x57/0x70
[ 174.669002] [<ffffffff8111e568>] ? __mlock_vma_pages_range+0x68/0x70
[ 174.669002] [<ffffffff8111ea01>] __mm_populate+0x71/0x140
[ 174.669002] [<ffffffff81121b5f>] vm_brk+0x7f/0xa0
[ 174.669002] [<ffffffff81199633>] load_elf_binary+0x1a73/0x1b10
[ 174.669002] [<ffffffff812d25a5>] ? ima_bprm_check+0x55/0x70
[ 174.669002] [<ffffffff8114890a>] search_binary_handler+0x12a/0x3b0
[ 174.669002] [<ffffffff81197bc0>] ? load_elf_library+0x210/0x210
[ 174.669002] [<ffffffff8114aa00>] do_execve_common+0x500/0x5c0
[ 174.669002] [<ffffffff8114aaf7>] do_execve+0x37/0x40
[ 174.669002] [<ffffffff8114ad9d>] sys_execve+0x3d/0x60
[ 174.669002] [<ffffffff81885379>] stub_execve+0x69/0xa0
I did a git bisect and bisection says that following is first bad
commit.
commit 09a9f1d27892255cfb9c91203f19476765e2d8d1
Author: Michel Lespinasse <walken@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu Mar 28 16:26:23 2013 -0700
Revert "mm: introduce VM_POPULATE flag to better deal with racy userspace pr
This reverts commit 186930500985 ("mm: introduce VM_POPULATE flag to
better deal with racy userspace programs").
I reverted above commit and problem gets fixed.
Following is my simple patch to lock down a selected process memory.
Index: linux-2.6/fs/binfmt_elf.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/fs/binfmt_elf.c 2013-04-13 01:50:26.380184101
-0400
+++ linux-2.6/fs/binfmt_elf.c 2013-04-13 01:50:49.827184821 -0400
@@ -721,6 +721,10 @@ static int load_elf_binary(struct linux_
/* OK, This is the point of no return */
current->mm->def_flags = def_flags;
+ if (!strcmp(bprm->filename, "/sbin/kexec")) {
+ printk("Memlocking /sbin/kexec\n");
+ current->mm->def_flags |= VM_LOCKED;
+ }
/* Do this immediately, since STACK_TOP as used in setup_arg_pages
may depend on the personality. */
Do you have any thoughts on what's going on. I am wondering if it indicates
a bigger problem which can then be triggered from other paths too.
Thanks
Vivek
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/