Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: exynos5440: Protect opp search calls with rcu lock
From: Nishanth Menon
Date: Mon Apr 15 2013 - 10:10:48 EST
Daniel,
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 1:24 AM, Amit Daniel Kachhap
<amit.daniel@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> As per the OPP library documentation(Documentation/power/opp.txt) all
> opp find/get calls should be protected by rcu locks.
>
> Signed-off-by: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>
> This patch is created against linux-next tree and is suggested by
> Nishanth Menon. (https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/4/12/119)
>
> drivers/cpufreq/exynos5440-cpufreq.c | 3 +++
> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos5440-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/exynos5440-cpufreq.c
> index ead7ed4..0c74018 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos5440-cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/exynos5440-cpufreq.c
> @@ -120,11 +120,13 @@ static int init_div_table(void)
> int i = 0;
> struct opp *opp;
>
> + rcu_read_lock();
> for (i = 0; freq_tbl[i].frequency != CPUFREQ_TABLE_END; i++) {
>
> opp = opp_find_freq_exact(dvfs_info->dev,
> freq_tbl[i].frequency * 1000, true);
> if (IS_ERR(opp)) {
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> dev_err(dvfs_info->dev,
> "failed to find valid OPP for %u KHZ\n",
> freq_tbl[i].frequency);
> @@ -159,6 +161,7 @@ static int init_div_table(void)
> __raw_writel(tmp, dvfs_info->base + XMU_PMU_P0_7 + 4 * i);
> }
>
> + rcu_read_unlock();
Is it not possible to reduce the amount of code protected by RCU lock?
something like this:
+ rcu_read_lock();
opp = opp_find_freq_exact(dvfs_info->dev,
freq_tbl[i].frequency * 1000, true);
if (IS_ERR(opp)) {
+ rcu_read_unlock();
dev_err(dvfs_info->dev,
"failed to find valid OPP for %u KHZ\n",
freq_tbl[i].frequency);
return PTR_ERR(opp);
}
+ volt_id = opp_get_voltage(opp);
+ rcu_unlock();
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/