Re: [PATCH 097/102] efivars: explicitly calculate length ofVariableName
From: Luis Henriques
Date: Tue Apr 16 2013 - 06:33:41 EST
(Adding Ben back to the CC list; not sure how his email was dropped)
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 10:12:56AM +0100, Luis Henriques wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 03:57:12PM +0000, Seiji Aguchi wrote:
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Luis Henriques [mailto:luis.henriques@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2013 8:18 AM
> > > To: Lingzhu Xiang
> > > Cc: Ben Hutchings; Seiji Aguchi; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; kernel-team@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Matthew
> > > Garrett; Josh Boyer; Michael Schroeder; Lee, Chun-Yi; Matt Fleming
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 097/102] efivars: explicitly calculate length of VariableName
> > >
> > > On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 06:27:13PM +0800, Lingzhu Xiang wrote:
> > > > On 04/10/2013 06:45 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > > >On Mon, 2013-04-08 at 10:50 +0100, Luis Henriques wrote:
> > > > >>3.5.7.10 -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
> > > > >>
> > > > >>------------------
> > > > >>
> > > > >>From: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>commit ec50bd32f1672d38ddce10fb1841cbfda89cfe9a upstream.
> > > > >>
> > > > >>It's not wise to assume VariableNameSize represents the length of
> > > > >>VariableName, as not all firmware updates VariableNameSize in the
> > > > >>same way (some don't update it at all if EFI_SUCCESS is returned).
> > > > >>There are even implementations out there that update
> > > > >>VariableNameSize with values that are both larger than the string
> > > > >>returned in VariableName and smaller than the buffer passed to
> > > > >>GetNextVariableName(), which resulted in the following bug report
> > > > >>from Michael Schroeder,
> > > > >>
> > > > >> > On HP z220 system (firmware version 1.54), some EFI variables are
> > > > >> > incorrectly named :
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > ls -d /sys/firmware/efi/vars/*8be4d* | grep -v -- -8be returns
> > > > >> > /sys/firmware/efi/vars/dbxDefault-pport8be4df61-93ca-11d2-aa0d-00e098032b8c
> > > > >> > /sys/firmware/efi/vars/KEKDefault-pport8be4df61-93ca-11d2-aa0d-00e098032b8c
> > > > >> > /sys/firmware/efi/vars/SecureBoot-pport8be4df61-93ca-11d2-aa0d-00e098032b8c
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> /sys/firmware/efi/vars/SetupMode-Information8be4df61-93ca-11d2-aa0d
> > > > >> -00e098032b8c
> > > > >>
> > > > >>The issue here is that because we blindly use VariableNameSize
> > > > >>without verifying its value, we can potentially read garbage values
> > > > >>from the buffer containing VariableName if VariableNameSize is
> > > > >>larger than the length of VariableName.
> > > > >>
> > > > >>Since VariableName is a string, we can calculate its size by
> > > > >>searching for the terminating NULL character.
> > > > >>
> > > > >>Reported-by: Frederic Crozat <fcrozat@xxxxxxxx>
> > > > >>Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > >>Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > >>Cc: Michael Schroeder <mls@xxxxxxxx>
> > > > >>Cc: Lee, Chun-Yi <jlee@xxxxxxxx>
> > > > >>Cc: Lingzhu Xiang <lxiang@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > >>Cc: Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@xxxxxxx>
> > > > >>Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@xxxxxxxxx> [ Backported
> > > > >>for 3.4-stable. Removed workqueue code added in a93bc0c 3.9-rc1. ]
> > > > >[...]
> > > > >
> > > > >I thought the workqueue addition was a worthwhile fix in its own
> > > > >right, so for 3.2.y I cherry-picked that as well.
> > > >
> > > > FWIW, the workqueue patch is 1/2 of this patchset[1] fixing closely
> > > > related problems. The other one is 81fa4e58.
> > > >
> > > > [1]: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1439570
> > > >
> > > > I tried to avoid pulling too much for stable because the patchset is
> > > > quite large and I suspect the problem it fixes is only theoretical.
> > > > I reported the original bug but was unable to break anything except
> > > > getting call traces with various CONFIG_DEBUG_*.
> > > >
> > > > What's your opinion, Seiji?
> > >
> > > Ok, so just to clarify: you're suggesting me to pick the following commits:
> > >
> > > 81fa4e581d9283f7992a0d8c534bb141eb840a14 efivars: Disable external interrupt while holding efivars->lock
> > > a93bc0c6e07ed9bac44700280e65e2945d864fd4 efi_pstore: Introducing workqueue updating sysfs
> > > ec50bd32f1672d38ddce10fb1841cbfda89cfe9a efivars: explicitly calculate length of VariableName
> > > e971318bbed610e28bb3fde9d548e6aaf0a6b02e efivars: Handle duplicate names from get_next_variable()
> >
> > I agree to add these commits to a stable tree.
> >
> Thank you Seiji. I'll queue these for the next 3.5 kernel.
So, after spending some time around this, I ended up picking much
more commits than those listed above. Since this code in 3.5.y wasn't
that different from Ben's 3.2.y, I took the liberty of picking all the
bits I was missing from there. Here's what I ended up with:
d80a361d779a9f19498943d1ca84243209cd5647 efi_pstore: Check remaining space with QueryVariableInfo() before writing data
81fa4e581d9283f7992a0d8c534bb141eb840a14 efivars: Disable external interrupt while holding efivars->lock
68d929862e29a8b52a7f2f2f86a0600423b093cd efi: be more paranoid about available space when creating variables
ed9dc8ce7a1c8115dba9483a9b51df8b63a2e0ef efivars: Allow disabling use as a pstore backend
ec0971ba5372a4dfa753f232449d23a8fd98490e efivars: Add module parameter to disable use as a pstore backend
ca0ba26fbbd2d81c43085df49ce0abfe34535a90 efivars: Fix check for CONFIG_EFI_VARS_PSTORE_DEFAULT_DISABLE
a93bc0c6e07ed9bac44700280e65e2945d864fd4 efi_pstore: Introducing workqueue updating sysfs
ec50bd32f1672d38ddce10fb1841cbfda89cfe9a efivars: explicitly calculate length of VariableName
e971318bbed610e28bb3fde9d548e6aaf0a6b02e efivars: Handle duplicate names from get_next_variable()
efivars: pstore: Do not check size when erasing variable
(this last commit was picked from 3.2.y directly, its not an upstream
commit)
I'll be sending out 3.5.7.11 for review later this week, and I would
really appreciate any feedback on these commits.
(Ben: Thanks a lot, since most of the backport work was took from your
tree.)
Cheers,
--
Luis
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/