Re: [PATCH 4/8] Read/Write oops nvram partition via pstore

[Aruna Balakrishnaiah]

On Tuesday 16 April 2013 11:50 AM, Aruna Balakrishnaiah wrote:
> Currently with this patchset, pstore is not supporting compression of 
> oops-messages
> since it involves some changes in the pstore framework.
>
> big_oops_buf will hold the large part of oops data which will be compressed 
> and put
> to oops_buf.
>
> big_oops_buf: (1.45 of oops_partition_size)

Sorry, big_oops_buf is (2.22 of oops_data_sz)

where oops_data_sz is oops_partition_size - sizeof(oops_log_info).

where oops_log_info is oops header.

> _________________________
> |  header |   oops-text |
> |_________|_____________|
>
> <header> is added by the pstore.
>
> So in case compression fails:
>
> we would need to log the header + last few bytes of big_oops_buf to oops_buf.
> oops_buf: (this is of oops_partition_size)

We would need to log the header + last oops_data_sz bytes of big_oops_buf to 
oops_buf.
So that we can have the header while throwing away the data that immediately
follows it.

> we need last few bytes of big_oops_buf as we need to log the recent messages of
> printk buffer. For which we need to know the header size and it involves some
> changes in the pstore framework.

Just communicating the header size from pstore would do the job for us.

> I have the compression patches ready, will be posting it soon as a separate set.
>
> > cheers

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/