Re: [PATCH 18/19] ARM: at91: suspend both memory controllers on at91sam9263

[Arnd Bergmann]

On Thursday 18 April 2013, Nicolas Ferre wrote:

> > This patch blindly removes the warning and changes the
> > at91sam9263 to use the same code at at91sam9g45, which
> > may or may not be the right solution. If it is not,
> > maybe someone could provide a better fix.
> 
> Maybe you can remove this paragraph: now you are using the proper fix
> with proper RAM type.
> 
> > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> What is the future of this patch series: do you want us to take this
> patch separately or to you want to apply the whole series on the arm-soc
> tree?

I'd prefer if you could just apply or forward it to an appropriate tree.

Most of the other patches have found their way into mainline by now.

> > Cc: Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagnioj@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Andrew Victor <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Albin Tonnerre <albin.tonnerre@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Moreover, this patch my conflict with Daniel's current initiative to
> move cpuidle driver to its own directory: how do we coordinate with each
> other?

Maybe you can make sure it actually works and send it to Daniel to apply on
top of his other patches?

	Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/