Re: [PATCH v9 00/12] Driver for Si476x series of chips

[Samuel Ortiz]

On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 02:28:00PM -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Em Thu, 18 Apr 2013 09:58:26 -0700
> Andrey Smirnov <andrew.smirnov@xxxxxxxxx> escreveu:
> 
> > Driver for Si476x series of chips
> > 
> > This is a eight version of the patchset originaly posted here:
> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/9/13/590
> > 
> > Second version of the patch was posted here:
> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/10/5/598
> > 
> > Third version of the patch was posted here:
> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/10/23/510
> > 
> > Fourth version of the patch was posted here:
> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/2/18/572
> > 
> > Fifth version of the patch was posted here:
> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/2/26/45
> > 
> > Sixth version of the patch was posted here:
> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/2/26/257
> > 
> > Seventh version of the patch was posted here:
> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/2/27/22
> > 
> > Eighth version of the patch was posted here:
> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/3/26/891
> > 
> > To save everyone's time I'll repost the original description of it:
> > 
> > This patchset contains a driver for a Silicon Laboratories 476x series
> > of radio tuners. The driver itself is implemented as an MFD devices
> > comprised of three parts: 
> >  1. Core device that provides all the other devices with basic
> > functionality and locking scheme.
> >  2. Radio device that translates between V4L2 subsystem requests into
> > Core device commands.
> >  3. Codec device that does similar to the earlier described task, but
> > for ALSA SoC subsystem.
> > 
> > v9 of this driver has following changes:
> >    - MFD part of the driver no longer depends on the header file added
> >      by the radio driver(media/si476x.h) which should potential
> >      restore the bisectability of the patches
> > 
> > Mauro, I am not sure if you reverted changes in patches 5 - 7, so I am
> > including them just in case.
> 
> No, I didn't revert all patches. I just reverted two patches: the
> last one, and the one that Samuel asked me.
Sorry I didn't have time to check your email from yesterday, but I was
actually hoping you would revert the whole patchset, then pull from my
mfd-next/topic/si476x branch to fetch the MFD bits and then apply the
v4l2/media ones (From patchset v9) on top of that.
Does that make sense to you ?

Cheers,
Samuel.

-- 
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
http://oss.intel.com/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/