Re: [PATCH 2/2] dma:of: Use a mutex to protect the of_dma_list

[Arnd Bergmann]

On Friday 19 April 2013, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:

> This is rather ugly and unnecessary and non of the current users of
> of_dma_controller_free() check it's return value anyway. Instead protect the
> list by a mutex. The mutex will be held as long as a request operation is in
> progress. So if of_dma_controller_free() is called while a request operation is
> in progress it will be put to sleep and only wake up once the request operation
> has finished.
> 
> This means that it is no longer possible to register or unregister OF DMA
> controllers from a context where it's not possible to sleep. But I doubt that
> we'll ever need this.
> 
> Also rename of_dma_get_controller back to of_dma_find_controller.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@xxxxxxxxxx>

I guess we could also fix it by turning the reference count into a proper
kref with kref_put calling the destructor, but your solution seems to solve
the problem just as well.

Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/