Re: [PATCH] sched: wake-affine throttle

[Ingo Molnar]

* Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> OK,.. Ingo said that pipe-test was the original motivation for 
> wake_affine() and since that's currently broken to pieces due to 
> select_idle_sibling() is there still a benefit to having it at all?
> 
> Can anybody find any significant regression when simply killing 
> wake_affine()?

I'd suggest doing a patch that does:

   s/SD_WAKE_AFFINE/0*SD_WAKE_AFFINE

in all the relevant toplogy.h files, but otherwise keep the logic in 
place. That way it's easy to revert.

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/