Re: [PATCH 0/4] ARM 64 bit sched_clock take #2

[Mark Rutland]

On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 04:36:14PM +0100, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 04/22/13 08:34, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > Hi Stephen,
> >
> > On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 01:29:02AM +0100, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> >> This is what I was thinking. I don't see why we can't move this to generic
> >> code and have arm64 use it too. Those patches will follow once I find an
> >> arm64 compiler.
> >>
> >> First two patches should probably go in even if the 64 bit stuff doesn't go in
> >> at the same time.
> >>
> >> Stephen Boyd (4):
> >>   ARM: sched_clock: Remove unused needs_suspend member
> >>   ARM: sched_clock: Return suspended count earlier
> >>   ARM: sched_clock: Add support for >32 bit sched_clock
> >>   ARM: arch_timer: Move to setup_sched_clock_64()
> >>
> >>  arch/arm/include/asm/sched_clock.h |   5 +-
> >>  arch/arm/kernel/arch_timer.c       |  14 +----
> >>  arch/arm/kernel/sched_clock.c      | 111 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> >>  3 files changed, 84 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
> > I wanted to look at the series with more context, but I don't seem to be able
> > to apply patch 2 and beyond to my tree, and I couldn't figure out what tree
> > this series was based on.
> >
> > What do I need to use as the base for this series?
> 
> These are based on next-20130419.

Cheers!

Mark.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/