Re: question about buffer_busy check

[Al Viro]

On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 03:41:18PM +0400, Dmitry Monakhov wrote:
> The only guess I have is that this is a miss typo  because buffer
> is busy if some one hold an reference (bh->b_count !=0 )  ||
> it is (dirty | locked). So following patch

... is pointless.  All callers only care about the return value being
zero or non-zero and not about specific values.  Granted, doing it that
way is a micro-optimization, but it's still a valid one.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/