[ 31/42] perf/x86: Fix offcore_rsp valid mask for SNB/IVB
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Date: Tue Apr 23 2013 - 17:54:09 EST
3.8-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Stephane Eranian <eranian@xxxxxxxxxx>
commit f1923820c447e986a9da0fc6bf60c1dccdf0408e upstream.
The valid mask for both offcore_response_0 and
offcore_response_1 was wrong for SNB/SNB-EP,
IVB/IVB-EP. It was possible to write to
reserved bit and cause a GP fault crashing
the kernel.
This patch fixes the problem by correctly marking the
reserved bits in the valid mask for all the processors
mentioned above.
A distinction between desktop and server parts is introduced
because bits 24-30 are only available on the server parts.
This version of the patch is just a rebase to perf/urgent tree
and should apply to older kernels as well.
Signed-off-by: Stephane Eranian <eranian@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx
Cc: ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
@@ -128,8 +128,14 @@ static struct event_constraint intel_gen
};
static struct extra_reg intel_snb_extra_regs[] __read_mostly = {
- INTEL_EVENT_EXTRA_REG(0xb7, MSR_OFFCORE_RSP_0, 0x3fffffffffull, RSP_0),
- INTEL_EVENT_EXTRA_REG(0xbb, MSR_OFFCORE_RSP_1, 0x3fffffffffull, RSP_1),
+ INTEL_EVENT_EXTRA_REG(0xb7, MSR_OFFCORE_RSP_0, 0x3f807f8fffull, RSP_0),
+ INTEL_EVENT_EXTRA_REG(0xbb, MSR_OFFCORE_RSP_1, 0x3f807f8fffull, RSP_1),
+ EVENT_EXTRA_END
+};
+
+static struct extra_reg intel_snbep_extra_regs[] __read_mostly = {
+ INTEL_EVENT_EXTRA_REG(0xb7, MSR_OFFCORE_RSP_0, 0x3fffff8fffull, RSP_0),
+ INTEL_EVENT_EXTRA_REG(0xbb, MSR_OFFCORE_RSP_1, 0x3fffff8fffull, RSP_1),
EVENT_EXTRA_END
};
@@ -2072,7 +2078,10 @@ __init int intel_pmu_init(void)
x86_pmu.event_constraints = intel_snb_event_constraints;
x86_pmu.pebs_constraints = intel_snb_pebs_event_constraints;
x86_pmu.pebs_aliases = intel_pebs_aliases_snb;
- x86_pmu.extra_regs = intel_snb_extra_regs;
+ if (boot_cpu_data.x86_model == 45)
+ x86_pmu.extra_regs = intel_snbep_extra_regs;
+ else
+ x86_pmu.extra_regs = intel_snb_extra_regs;
/* all extra regs are per-cpu when HT is on */
x86_pmu.er_flags |= ERF_HAS_RSP_1;
x86_pmu.er_flags |= ERF_NO_HT_SHARING;
@@ -2098,7 +2107,10 @@ __init int intel_pmu_init(void)
x86_pmu.event_constraints = intel_snb_event_constraints;
x86_pmu.pebs_constraints = intel_ivb_pebs_event_constraints;
x86_pmu.pebs_aliases = intel_pebs_aliases_snb;
- x86_pmu.extra_regs = intel_snb_extra_regs;
+ if (boot_cpu_data.x86_model == 62)
+ x86_pmu.extra_regs = intel_snbep_extra_regs;
+ else
+ x86_pmu.extra_regs = intel_snb_extra_regs;
/* all extra regs are per-cpu when HT is on */
x86_pmu.er_flags |= ERF_HAS_RSP_1;
x86_pmu.er_flags |= ERF_NO_HT_SHARING;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/