Re: [PATCH -next RESEND] gpu: host1x: drm: fix missing unlock on error

From: Wei Yongjun
Date: Tue Apr 23 2013 - 23:07:36 EST


On 04/24/2013 10:53 AM, Mark Zhang wrote:
> I think Thierry has acked this patch. So why?

Yes, Thierry has acked this patch five months ago, but this patch does not
applied util now. And the source file has been moved from
drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/host1x.c to drivers/gpu/host1x/drm/drm.c, so I am not
sure whether this patch was lost.

Regards,
Yongjun Wei


>
> Mark
> On 04/24/2013 10:48 AM, Wei Yongjun wrote:
>> From: Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Add the missing unlock before return from function host1x_drm_init() and
>> host1x_drm_exit() in the error handling case.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> rebased on the latest linux-next.git tree.
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/host1x/drm/drm.c | 2 ++
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/host1x/drm/drm.c b/drivers/gpu/host1x/drm/drm.c
>> index 2b561c9..0dbb9c0 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/host1x/drm/drm.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/host1x/drm/drm.c
>> @@ -148,6 +148,7 @@ int host1x_drm_init(struct host1x_drm *host1x, struct drm_device *drm)
>> dev_err(host1x->dev,
>> "DRM setup failed for %s: %d\n",
>> dev_name(client->dev), err);
>> + mutex_unlock(&host1x->clients_lock);
>> return err;
>> }
>> }
>> @@ -175,6 +176,7 @@ int host1x_drm_exit(struct host1x_drm *host1x)
>> dev_err(host1x->dev,
>> "DRM cleanup failed for %s: %d\n",
>> dev_name(client->dev), err);
>> + mutex_unlock(&host1x->clients_lock);
>> return err;
>> }
>> }
>>
>


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/