Re: [ 00/23] 3.0.75-stable review

From: Shuah Khan
Date: Wed Apr 24 2013 - 12:35:24 EST

On Tue, 2013-04-23 at 14:56 -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.0.75 release.
> There are 23 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> Responses should be made by Thu Apr 25 21:54:13 UTC 2013.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> thanks,
> greg k-h
> -------------

Patches applied cleanly to 3.0.74, 3.4.41, and 3.8.8

Reviewing patches - will let you know anything odd.

Compiled and booted on the following systems:

Samsung Series 9 Intel Corei5
HP ProBook 6475b AMD A10-4600M APU with Radeon(tm) HD Graphics

dmesgs for all releases look good. No regressions compared to the
previous dmesgs for each of these releases.

Cross-compile tests results:

alpha: defconfig passed on all
arm: defconfig passed on all
arm64: not applicable to 3.0.y, 3.4.y. defconfig passed on 3.8.y
c6x: not applicable to 3.0.y, defconfig passed on 3.4.y, and 3.8.y.
mips: defconfig passed on all
mipsel: defconfig passed on all
powerpc: wii_defconfig passed on all
sh: defconfig passed on all
sparc: defconfig passed on all
tile: tilegx_defconfig passed on all

Samsung Series 9 Intel Corei5:
Note: Screaming fast system with ssd!! There are some vga issues on
3.0.74 and 3.0.75-rc1 on this system and I am going to investigate those
and see what's going on. No problems with 3.4 and 3.8. My current guess
is that 3.5 is the minimum for this system.

-- Shuah

èº{.nÇ+‰·Ÿ®‰­†+%ŠËlzwm…ébëæìr¸›zX§»®w¥Š{ayºÊÚë,j­¢f£¢·hš‹àz¹®w¥¢¸ ¢·¦j:+v‰¨ŠwèjØm¶Ÿÿ¾«‘êçzZ+ƒùšŽŠÝj"ú!¶iO•æ¬z·švØ^¶m§ÿðà nÆàþY&—