Re: [ 00/26] 3.4.42-stable review

From: Shuah Khan
Date: Wed Apr 24 2013 - 12:42:41 EST

On Tue, 2013-04-23 at 14:53 -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.4.42 release.
> There are 26 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> Responses should be made by Thu Apr 25 21:52:47 UTC 2013.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> thanks,
> greg k-h

Patches applied cleanly to 3.0.74, 3.4.41, and 3.8.8

Reviewing patches - will let you know anything odd.

Compiled and booted on the following systems:

Samsung Series 9 Intel Corei5
HP ProBook 6475b AMD A10-4600M APU with Radeon(tm) HD Graphics

dmesgs for all releases look good. No regressions compared to the
dmesgs for each of these releases.

Cross-compile tests results:

alpha: defconfig passed on all
arm: defconfig passed on all
arm64: not applicable to 3.0.y, 3.4.y. defconfig passed on 3.8.y
c6x: not applicable to 3.0.y, defconfig passed on 3.4.y, and 3.8.y.
mips: defconfig passed on all
mipsel: defconfig passed on all
powerpc: wii_defconfig passed on all
sh: defconfig passed on all
sparc: defconfig passed on all
tile: tilegx_defconfig passed on all

Samsung Series 9 Intel Corei5:
Note: Screaming fast system with ssd!! There are some vga issues on
3.0.74 and 3.0.75-rc1 on this system and I am going to investigate those
and see what's going on. No problems with 3.4 and 3.8. My current guess
is that 3.5 is the minimum for this system.

-- Shuah

N‹§²æìr¸›yúèšØb²X¬¶ÇvØ^–)Þ{.nÇ+‰·¥Š{±‘êçzX§¶›¡Ü}©ž²ÆzÚ&j:+v‰¨¾«‘êçzZ+€Ê+zf£¢·hšˆ§~†­†Ûiÿûàz¹®w¥¢¸?™¨è­Ú&¢)ßf”ù^jÇy§m…á@A«a¶Úÿ 0¶ìh®å’i