Re: [PATCH 03/32 v3] dmaengine: ste_dma40: Use the BIT macro toreplace ugly '(1 << x)'s

[Rabin Vincent]

2013/4/24 Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> The aim is to make the code that little more readable.
>
> Acked-by: Vinod Koul <vnod.koul@xxxxxxxxx>
> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx>

Please pay closer attention to the semantics of each usage instead of
just replacing all x left shifts of 1 by BIT(x) for "readability".

>         if (seg_max > STEDMA40_MAX_SEG_SIZE)
> -               seg_max -= (1 << max_w);
> +               seg_max -= BIT(max_w);
>
> -       if (!IS_ALIGNED(size, 1 << max_w))
> +       if (!IS_ALIGNED(size, BIT(max_w)))
>                 return -EINVAL;

Here and in all other places where the values are from cfg->data_width,
the semantic purpose of the shift is not for setting a particular bit
but instead for converting the data_width field into the data width
value in bytes.  You should not change these usages to BIT().

It would be instead better to just make the cfg->data_width as the
number of bytes and convert them to the appropriate hardware field
values when the descriptors are constructed.  That of course should be
in another patch.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/