Re: Kconfig doesn't support select on choices (was Re: [GIT PULL]nohz: Adaptively stop the tick, finally)

[Frederic Weisbecker]

2013/4/25 Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>:
>
> * Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> 2013/4/25 Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>:
>> >
>> > * Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >
>> >> >         depends on VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING_GEN
>> >> >
>> >> > It should _really_ select both the RCU and the CPU time accounting model
>> >> > automatically!
>> >>
>> >> Yeah I know. I have yet to fix that in Kconfig (it's a Kconfig limitation).
>> >
>> > Why cannot we simply select it and its dependencies, explicitly, for the
>> > time being? Something like:
>> >
>> >         depends on 64BIT
>> >         select VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING
>> >         select VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING_GEN
>> >
>> > 90% of the .config's have VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING_GEN turned off, because it's
>> > a default-off feature - so dynticks-full is effectively hidden from the
>> > large majority of testers...
>>
>> Whatever we do, it seems that select does not work with choices.
>>
>> Michal, we are running into an issue where a Kconfig option needs to
>> select CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING_GEN but this latter option is part of
>> a choice menu so it doesn't work. As a result we are forced to use a
>> "depends on" and this hides the high level option we are interested in
>> (here full dynticks) behind its low level dependency. How hard do you
>> think it would be to fix this? I tried something that worked half-way
>> but I quickly got lost in the Kconfig maze.
>
> While it's not an ideal solution, we could try to create three bools out
> of the choice options, as a workaround?

I thought about that yeah, at least for a temporary solution. Let's
try it, I'll see what I can get.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/