Re: [PATCH] NFSv4: Use exponential backoff delay for Ni

From: Matt W. Benjamin
Date: Thu Apr 25 2013 - 11:34:12 EST


Just to clarify, the IBM delay behavior is not legal?


----- "Trond Myklebust" <Trond.Myklebust@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> OK, then. Now all I need is actual motivation for changing the
> existing
> code other than handwaving arguments about "polling is better than
> flat
> waits".
> What actual use cases are impacting us now, other than the AIX design
> decision to force CLOSE to retry at least once before succeeding?

Matt Benjamin
The Linux Box
206 South Fifth Ave. Suite 150
Ann Arbor, MI 48104

tel. 734-761-4689
fax. 734-769-8938
cel. 734-216-5309
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at