Re: [PATCH 1/1] staging: ti-soc-thermal: remove usage ofIS_ERR_OR_NULL

[Russell King]

On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 09:46:16AM -0400, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.c b/drivers/staging/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.c
> index f20c1cf..5027833 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.c
> @@ -469,7 +469,7 @@ static inline int ti_bandgap_validate(struct ti_bandgap *bgp, int id)
>  {
>  	int ret = 0;
>  
> -	if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(bgp)) {
> +	if (!bgp || IS_ERR(bgp)) {
>  		pr_err("%s: invalid bandgap pointer\n", __func__);
>  		ret = -EINVAL;

We really don't need these kinds of "bad pointer passed to a function"
checks in the kernel.  Just ensure that all callers have correctly
error checked the return value.

>  		goto exit;
> @@ -1191,7 +1191,7 @@ int ti_bandgap_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	int clk_rate, ret = 0, i;
>  
>  	bgp = ti_bandgap_build(pdev);
> -	if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(bgp)) {
> +	if (IS_ERR(bgp)) {
>  		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to fetch platform data\n");
>  		return PTR_ERR(bgp);

That was definitely a bug, good fix.

>  	}
> @@ -1207,14 +1207,14 @@ int ti_bandgap_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	}
>  
>  	bgp->fclock = clk_get(NULL, bgp->conf->fclock_name);
> -	ret = IS_ERR_OR_NULL(bgp->fclock);
> +	ret = IS_ERR(bgp->fclock);
>  	if (ret) {
>  		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to request fclock reference\n");
>  		goto free_irqs;
>  	}

I'm not sure that's correct.  If free_irqs ends up returning 'ret' then
it will return 0 or 1, not the error code.

	if (IS_ERR(bgp->fclock)) {
		dev_err...
		ret = PTR_ERR(bgp->fclock);
		goto free_irqs;
	}

would be much better in that case.

Also another fix - clk_get(&pdev->dev, "fclk") and arrange for the
clkdev settings for this device.  Same for the one below but call
it "div_clk" or something.

>  
>  	bgp->div_clk = clk_get(NULL,  bgp->conf->div_ck_name);
> -	ret = IS_ERR_OR_NULL(bgp->div_clk);
> +	ret = IS_ERR(bgp->div_clk);
>  	if (ret) {

Possibly the same problem here if 'ret' ends up being returned as-is.

> diff --git a/drivers/staging/ti-soc-thermal/ti-thermal-common.c b/drivers/staging/ti-soc-thermal/ti-thermal-common.c
> index 8e67ebf..4c5f55c37 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/ti-soc-thermal/ti-thermal-common.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/ti-soc-thermal/ti-thermal-common.c
> @@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ static inline int ti_thermal_get_temp(struct thermal_zone_device *thermal,
>  
>  	pcb_tz = data->pcb_tz;
>  	/* In case pcb zone is available, use the extrapolation rule with it */
> -	if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(pcb_tz)) {
> +	if (!IS_ERR(pcb_tz)) {
>  		ret = thermal_zone_get_temp(pcb_tz, &pcb_temp);
>  		if (!ret) {
>  			tmp -= pcb_temp; /* got a valid PCB temp */
> @@ -124,7 +124,7 @@ static int ti_thermal_bind(struct thermal_zone_device *thermal,
>  	struct ti_thermal_data *data = thermal->devdata;
>  	int id;
>  
> -	if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(data))
> +	if (!data || IS_ERR(data))
>  		return -ENODEV;
>  
>  	/* check if this is the cooling device we registered */
> @@ -146,7 +146,7 @@ static int ti_thermal_unbind(struct thermal_zone_device *thermal,
>  {
>  	struct ti_thermal_data *data = thermal->devdata;
>  
> -	if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(data))
> +	if (!data || IS_ERR(data))
>  		return -ENODEV;
>  
>  	/* check if this is the cooling device we registered */
> @@ -282,6 +282,7 @@ static struct ti_thermal_data
>  	data->sensor_id = id;
>  	data->bgp = bgp;
>  	data->mode = THERMAL_DEVICE_ENABLED;
> +	/* pcb_tz will be either valid or PTR_ERR() */
>  	data->pcb_tz = thermal_zone_get_zone_by_name("pcb");
>  	INIT_WORK(&data->thermal_wq, ti_thermal_work);
>  
> @@ -295,7 +296,7 @@ int ti_thermal_expose_sensor(struct ti_bandgap *bgp, int id,
>  
>  	data = ti_bandgap_get_sensor_data(bgp, id);
>  
> -	if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(data))
> +	if (!data || IS_ERR(data))
>  		data = ti_thermal_build_data(bgp, id);
>  
>  	if (!data)
> @@ -306,7 +307,7 @@ int ti_thermal_expose_sensor(struct ti_bandgap *bgp, int id,
>  				OMAP_TRIP_NUMBER, 0, data, &ti_thermal_ops,
>  				NULL, FAST_TEMP_MONITORING_RATE,
>  				FAST_TEMP_MONITORING_RATE);
> -	if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(data->ti_thermal)) {
> +	if (IS_ERR(data->ti_thermal)) {
>  		dev_err(bgp->dev, "thermal zone device is NULL\n");
>  		return PTR_ERR(data->ti_thermal);
>  	}
> @@ -343,7 +344,7 @@ int ti_thermal_register_cpu_cooling(struct ti_bandgap *bgp, int id)
>  	struct ti_thermal_data *data;
>  
>  	data = ti_bandgap_get_sensor_data(bgp, id);
> -	if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(data))
> +	if (!data || IS_ERR(data))
>  		data = ti_thermal_build_data(bgp, id);

I can't tell whether the above are correct or not as I can't see the
original code.

>  
>  	if (!data)
> @@ -356,7 +357,7 @@ int ti_thermal_register_cpu_cooling(struct ti_bandgap *bgp, int id)
>  
>  	/* Register cooling device */
>  	data->cool_dev = cpufreq_cooling_register(cpu_present_mask);
> -	if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(data->cool_dev)) {
> +	if (IS_ERR(data->cool_dev)) {
>  		dev_err(bgp->dev,
>  			"Failed to register cpufreq cooling device\n");
>  		return PTR_ERR(data->cool_dev);

Definitely a bug - and another good fix.

-- 
Russell King
 Linux kernel    2.6 ARM Linux   - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
 maintainer of:
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/