[patch 10/15] clockevents: Simplify locking
From: Thomas Gleixner
Date: Thu Apr 25 2013 - 16:33:36 EST
Now that the notifier chain is gone there are no other users and it's
pointless to nest tick_device_lock inside of clockevents_lock because
there is no other use case.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
kernel/time/tick-common.c | 22 +++++-----------------
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
Index: tip/kernel/time/tick-common.c
===================================================================
--- tip.orig/kernel/time/tick-common.c
+++ tip/kernel/time/tick-common.c
@@ -33,7 +33,6 @@ DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct tick_device, tick_
ktime_t tick_next_period;
ktime_t tick_period;
int tick_do_timer_cpu __read_mostly = TICK_DO_TIMER_BOOT;
-static DEFINE_RAW_SPINLOCK(tick_device_lock);
/*
* Debugging: see timer_list.c
@@ -203,16 +202,14 @@ static void tick_setup_device(struct tic
}
/*
- * Check, if the new registered device should be used.
+ * Check, if the new registered device should be used. Called with
+ * clockevents_lock held and interrupts disabled.
*/
void tick_check_new_device(struct clock_event_device *newdev)
{
struct clock_event_device *curdev;
struct tick_device *td;
int cpu;
- unsigned long flags;
-
- raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&tick_device_lock, flags);
cpu = smp_processor_id();
if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, newdev->cpumask))
@@ -270,8 +267,6 @@ void tick_check_new_device(struct clock_
tick_setup_device(td, newdev, cpu, cpumask_of(cpu));
if (newdev->features & CLOCK_EVT_FEAT_ONESHOT)
tick_oneshot_notify();
-
- raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tick_device_lock, flags);
return;
out_bc:
@@ -279,7 +274,6 @@ out_bc:
* Can the new device be used as a broadcast device ?
*/
tick_install_broadcast_device(newdev);
- raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tick_device_lock, flags);
}
/*
@@ -308,9 +302,7 @@ static void tick_shutdown(unsigned int *
{
struct tick_device *td = &per_cpu(tick_cpu_device, *cpup);
struct clock_event_device *dev = td->evtdev;
- unsigned long flags;
- raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&tick_device_lock, flags);
td->mode = TICKDEV_MODE_PERIODIC;
if (dev) {
/*
@@ -322,26 +314,20 @@ static void tick_shutdown(unsigned int *
dev->event_handler = clockevents_handle_noop;
td->evtdev = NULL;
}
- raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tick_device_lock, flags);
}
static void tick_suspend(void)
{
struct tick_device *td = &__get_cpu_var(tick_cpu_device);
- unsigned long flags;
- raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&tick_device_lock, flags);
clockevents_shutdown(td->evtdev);
- raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tick_device_lock, flags);
}
static void tick_resume(void)
{
struct tick_device *td = &__get_cpu_var(tick_cpu_device);
- unsigned long flags;
int broadcast = tick_resume_broadcast();
- raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&tick_device_lock, flags);
clockevents_set_mode(td->evtdev, CLOCK_EVT_MODE_RESUME);
if (!broadcast) {
@@ -350,9 +336,11 @@ static void tick_resume(void)
else
tick_resume_oneshot();
}
- raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tick_device_lock, flags);
}
+/*
+ * Called with clockevents_lock held and interrupts disabled
+ */
void tick_notify(unsigned long reason, void *dev)
{
switch (reason) {
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/