Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 26

[Sedat Dilek]

On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 12:37 PM, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 12:35 PM, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 12:04 PM, Michal Marek <mmarek@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 11:58:25AM +0200, Michal Marek wrote:
>>>> Can you send a copy of your .config?
>>>
>>> I can reproduce it as well:
>>>
>>> $ yes "" | make oldconfig
>>> ...
>>>   Enumeration method [M/y/?] (NEW)
>>>     Basic (RAPIDIO_ENUM_BASIC) [N/m/?] n
>>> ...
>>> #
>>> # configuration written to .config
>>> #
>>> $ make oldconfig
>>> ...
>>>   Enumeration method [M/y/?] (NEW)
>>>
>>>
>>> .config is attached.
>>>
>>
>> Mine, too.
>>
>> I hoped that -next release will be one w/o troubles
>> (cpufreq/intel_pstate / pm/timekeeping / ipc-sem-from-mmotm).
>> Unfortunately, I am not lucky :-(.
>>
>> Anyway, waiting for a fix.
>>
>
> Just FYI: Mail delivery troubles!
>
> Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently:
>
>      yann.morin.1998@xxxxxxx
>
> Technical details of permanent failure:
> Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the
> server for the recipient domain free.fr by mx1.free.fr. [212.27.48.6].
>
> The error that the other server returned was:
> 550 spam detected
> ...
>

With reverting all kbuild-next commits I was able to build again.

      Revert "kconfig: implement KCONFIG_PROBABILITY for randconfig"
      Revert "kconfig: allow specifying the seed for randconfig"
      Revert "kconfig: fix randomising choice entries in presence of
KCONFIG_ALLCONFIG"
      Revert "kconfig: do not override symbols already set"
      Revert "kconfig: fix randconfig tristate detection"

Patch attached!

- Sedat -


> - Sedat -
>
>> - Sedat -
>>
>>> Michal

Attachment: 3.9.0-rc8-next20130426-1-iniza-small.patch
Description: Binary data