Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 0/6] seccomp filter JIT

[Daniel Borkmann]

On 04/26/2013 02:31 PM, Xi Wang wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 7:46 AM, Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > I think BPF JIT for seccomp on ARM recently got applied to -mm tree
> > if I'm not mistaken. It was from Nicolas Schichan (cc):
> >
> > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.kernel/233416/
>
> Thanks for the pointer.
>
> For the ARM part, looks like Nicolas's patch requires to implement two
> wrappers for each arch:
>
>    void seccomp_jit_compile(struct seccomp_filter *fp);
>    void seccomp_jit_free(struct seccomp_filter *fp);
>
> The implementation of these wrappers is almost identical to:
>
>    void bpf_jit_compile(struct sk_filter *fp);
>    void bpf_jit_free(struct sk_filter *fp);
>
> While this patch uses a unified interface for both packet & seccomp filters.
>
>    bpf_func_t bpf_jit_compile(struct sock_filter *filter, unsigned int flen);
>    void bpf_jit_free(bpf_func_t bpf_func);

A unified interface seems more clean, imho.

> Shouldn't be hard to merge though.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/