Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 2/6] x86: bpf_jit_comp: supportBPF_S_ANC_SECCOMP_LD_W instruction
From: Xi Wang
Date: Fri Apr 26 2013 - 11:30:19 EST
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 11:11 AM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 2) Calling a function potentially destroys some registers.
> %rdi,%r8,%r9 for instance, so we are going to crash very easily.
> I dont know, I feel a bit uncomfortable having to explain this to
> someone sending security related patches...
My old code did save these registers. But, do we really need that for
seccomp? For example, %rdi (skb) is always NULL and never used by
seccomp filters. Did I miss anything?
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/