Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 2/6] x86: bpf_jit_comp: supportBPF_S_ANC_SECCOMP_LD_W instruction
From: Xi Wang
Date: Fri Apr 26 2013 - 12:02:49 EST
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 11:11 AM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 1) 'current' at the time the code is jitted (compiled) is not the
> 'current' at the time the filter will be evaluated.
> On x86_64, if CONFIG_IA32_EMULATION=y, syscall_get_arch() evaluates to :
> if (task_thread_info(task)->status & TS_COMPAT)
> return AUDIT_ARCH_I386;
> return AUDIT_ARCH_X86_64;
> So your code is completely wrong.
Just to be clear, are you worrying about a process changing its
personality after installing seccomp filters?
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/