Re: [PATCH v2] x86: make DR*_RESERVED unsigned long

[Oleg Nesterov]

On 04/26, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>
> On 04/26/2013 09:38 AM, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> >
> > 	- do_debug:
> >
> > 		dr6 &= ~DR6_RESERVED;
> >
> > 	  this also wrongly clears 32-63 bits. Fortunately these
> > 	  bits are reserved and must be zero.
>
> I don't think this is wrongly at all.

OK, I meant that it also clears the bits that are not specified in
DR6_RESERVED mask.

> The whole point is to mask out
> the bits that the handler doesn't want to deal with, so masking out the
> reserved bits [63:32] seems reasonable to me.

Then we should do

	- #define DR6_RESERVED    0xFFFF0FF0
	+ #define DR6_RESERVED    0xFFFFFFFFFFFF0FF0

?

or what? (just in case, I will happily agree with "do nothing" ;)

> The comment should probably be corrected, though.

Which one?

	/* Define reserved bits in DR6 which are always set to 1 */
	#define DR6_RESERVED    (0xFFFF0FF0UL)

	/* Filter out all the reserved bits which are preset to 1 */
	dr6 &= ~DR6_RESERVED;

I guess both should be updated then. But if I read the doc correctly
the lower reserved bits are set to 1.

However do_debug() does set_debugreg(0, 6) and this looks correct, the
doc says "debug handlers should clear the register before returning to
the interrupted task".

Oleg.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/