Re: [PATCH 10/21] [SCSI] nsp32: use mdelay instead of large udelayconstants

[James Bottomley]

On Mon, 2013-04-29 at 15:21 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Friday 26 April 2013, Masanori Goto wrote:
> > 2013/4/25 Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > ARM cannot handle udelay for more than 2 miliseconds, so we
> > > should use mdelay instead for those.
> > >
> > 
> > Singed-off-by: GOTO Masanori <gotom@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Thanks. I assume you mean "Acked-by", not "Singed-off" as in "burnt"
> or "Signed-off" as a notification that you have applied it to your
> own git tree.
> 
> I'll keep the patch with an your "Acked-by" line in my tree unless
> James wants to apply to the scsi tree.

I can, certainly.  I'll be sending the first scsi set today, but I'll be
doing another one for just before the close of the merge window.

Goto-san, while I have your attention, is the nsp_cs driver orphaned? I
know it's not your driver, but you did once work with its author (YOKOTA
Hiroshi <yokota@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>) and I'm trying to get some
cleanup on the static functions in the header files.

Thanks,

James











--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/