Re: [PATCH 6/4] arm64: Move to generic sched_clock infrastructure
From: Christopher Covington
Date: Wed May 01 2013 - 10:44:41 EST
On 05/01/2013 05:11 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Wed, May 01, 2013 at 01:54:35AM +0100, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>> Use the generic sched_clock infrastructure instead of rolling our
>> own. This has the added benefit of fixing suspend/resume as
>> outlined in 6a4dae5 (ARM: 7565/1: sched: stop sched_clock()
>> during suspend, 2012-10-23) and correcting the timestamps when
>> the hardware returns a value instead of 0 upon the first read.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Looks ok.
>
> Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
I built and ran this change and dependencies on top of Catalin's
soc-armv8-model branch [1] and was able to verify that it fixed the printk
timestamp jump.
1.
http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/cmarinas/linux-aarch64.git/log/?h=soc-armv8-model
Tested-by: Christopher Covington <cov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
--
Employee of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by the Linux Foundation.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/