Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 3/3] xen/arm: account for stolen ticks

[Ian Campbell]

On Wed, 2013-05-01 at 20:27 +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c b/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c
> index d30042e..8f040a0 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c
> @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
>  #include <xen/xen-ops.h>
>  #include <asm/xen/hypervisor.h>
>  #include <asm/xen/hypercall.h>
> +#include <asm/arch_timer.h>
>  #include <asm/system_misc.h>
>  #include <linux/interrupt.h>
>  #include <linux/irqreturn.h>
> @@ -172,6 +173,8 @@ static int __init xen_secondary_init(unsigned int cpu)
>  		   later ones fail to. */
>  		per_cpu(xen_vcpu, cpu) = vcpup;
>  	}
> +
> +	xen_setup_runstate_info(cpu);

Is this called for the boot processor too?

(do you have a linux-next branch where I can easily find the baseline
for this series?)

Ian.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/