Re: Basic perf PMU support for Haswell v11

[Ingo Molnar]

* Andi Kleen <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> v11: Rebase to perf/core. Fix extra regs. Rename INTX.

Actually, you did not do what I asked you to do, to rename INTX to IN_TX, 
you still kept the 'INTX' pattern that is confusingly similar to 
interrupts related names like 'INT3'.

I still see, even your latest patch, this:

 +#define HSW_INTX                                       (1ULL << 32)
 +#define HSW_INTX_CHECKPOINTED                          (1ULL << 33)

Why are you ignoring maintainer requests, repeatedly?

It woulnd't be a big issue and I'd do the rename myself if this wasn't a 
repeat pattern of passive-aggressive obstruction from you spanning several 
years, resisting or obstructing maintainer feedback whenever you can ...

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/