Re: [PATCH 4/4] ACPI / processor: Use common hotplug infrastructure

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

On Thu, May 02, 2013 at 02:31:51PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Split the ACPI processor driver into two parts, one that is
> non-modular, resides in the ACPI core and handles the enumeration
> and hotplug of processors and one that implements the rest of the
> existing processor driver functionality.
> 
> The non-modular part uses an ACPI scan handler object to enumerate
> processors on the basis of information provided by the ACPI namespace
> and to hook up with the common ACPI hotplug infrastructure.  It also
> populates the ACPI handle of each processor device having a
> corresponding object in the ACPI namespace, which allows the driver
> proper to bind to those devices, and makes the driver bind to them
> if it is readily available (i.e. loaded) when the scan handler's
> .attach() routine is running.
> 
> There are a few reasons to make this change.
> 
> First, switching the ACPI processor driver to using the common ACPI
> hotplug infrastructure reduces code duplication and size considerably,
> even though a new file is created along with a header comment etc.
> 
> Second, since the common hotplug code attempts to offline devices
> before starting the (non-reversible) removal procedure, it will abort
> (and possibly roll back) hot-remove operations involving processors
> if cpu_down() returns an error code for one of them instead of
> continuing them blindly (if /sys/firmware/acpi/hotplug/force_remove
> is unset).  That is a more desirable behavior than what the current
> code does.
> 
> Finally, the separation of the scan/hotplug part from the driver
> proper makes it possible to simplify the driver's .remove() routine,
> because it doesn't need to worry about the possible cleanup related
> to processor removal any more (the scan/hotplug part is responsible
> for that now) and can handle device removal and driver removal
> symmetricaly (i.e. as appropriate).
> 
> Some user-visible changes in sysfs are made (for example, the
> 'sysdev' link from the ACPI device node to the processor device's
> directory is gone and a 'physical_node' link is present instead,
> a 'firmware_node' link is present in the processor device's
> directory, the processor driver is now visible under
> /sys/bus/cpu/drivers/ and bound to the processor device), but
> that shouldn't affect the functionality that users care about
> (frequency scaling, C-states and thermal management).
> 
> Tested on my venerable Toshiba Portege R500.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>

For the driver core part:

Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/