Re: [patch 4/4] sched: Distangle worker accounting from rq->lock

[Steven Rostedt]

On Thu, 2013-05-02 at 17:12 -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 06:47:10PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 09:37:22AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > > [ Blast from the past! ]
> > > 
> > > When merging in 3.4.42 into the 3.4-rt branch I hit a conflict with the
> > > try_to_wake_up_local() call. It seems that the 3.4-rt patch has this
> > > patch applied. Although, this is not applied to any of the other -rt patches.
> > > 
> > 
> > I take that back. It's in 3.0-rt, 3.2-rt and 3.4-rt, but it's not in 3.6-rt
> > nor in 3.8-rt.
> 
> So, it's all good?  Or is there something I need to look into?

It looks good to me. I don't know why it's not in 3.6-rt or 3.8-rt. Was
there a reason that Thomas took it out? I don't know. Maybe it's not
needed or he thought it went mainline?

-- Steve


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/