Re: [git pull] GPIO for v3.10

[Jean Delvare]

On Fri, 3 May 2013 09:56:09 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 9:51 AM, Jean Delvare <khali@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > The real problem here is that two patches which depended on each other
> > went to you through 2 different maintainer trees (mfd maintained by
> > Samuel Ortiz and gpio maintained by Grant L. & Linus W.), and the git
> > pull requests reached you in the wrong order. That doesn't make us all
> > irresponsible and lame contributors/maintainers, does it?
> 
> F*ck yes it does.
> 
> It means that NOBODY EVEN TEST-COMPILED THE TREE THAT GOT SENT TO ME.
> 
> WTF?

It means that nobody test-compiled that tree with CONFIG_GPIO_UCB1400=m.

> If that's not "irresponsible and lame", I don't know what the hell is.

Hell, n.   1. The place or state of punishment of the wicked after
death.  2. A world where people volunteering to maintain kernel
subsystems get fewer, because they received more blame for their casual
mistakes than praise for their thankless work.

-- 
Jean Delvare
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/