Re: [PATCH v4 4/6] KVM: MMU: fast invalid all shadow pages

[Xiao Guangrong]

On 05/06/2013 08:36 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote:

>>> Step 1) Fix kvm_mmu_zap_all's behaviour: introduce lockbreak via
>>> spin_needbreak. Use generation numbers so that in case kvm_mmu_zap_all 
>>> releases mmu_lock and reacquires it again, only shadow pages 
>>> from the generation with which kvm_mmu_zap_all started are zapped (this
>>> guarantees forward progress and eventual termination).
>>>
>>> kvm_mmu_zap_generation()
>>> 	spin_lock(mmu_lock)
>>> 	int generation = kvm->arch.mmu_generation;
>>>
>>> 	for_each_shadow_page(sp) {
>>> 		if (sp->generation == kvm->arch.mmu_generation)
>>> 			zap_page(sp)
>>> 		if (spin_needbreak(mmu_lock)) {
>>> 			kvm->arch.mmu_generation++;
>>> 			cond_resched_lock(mmu_lock);
>>> 		}
>>> 	}
>>>
>>> kvm_mmu_zap_all()
>>> 	spin_lock(mmu_lock)
>>> 	for_each_shadow_page(sp) {
>>> 		if (spin_needbreak(mmu_lock)) {
>>> 			cond_resched_lock(mmu_lock);
>>> 		}
>>> 	}
>>>
>>> Use kvm_mmu_zap_generation for kvm_arch_flush_shadow_memslot.
>>> Use kvm_mmu_zap_all for kvm_mmu_notifier_release,kvm_destroy_vm.
>>>
>>> This addresses the main problem: excessively long hold times 
>>> of kvm_mmu_zap_all with very large guests.
>>>
>>> Do you see any problem with this logic? This was what i was thinking 
>>> we agreed.
>>
>> No. I understand it and it can work.
>>
>> Actually, it is similar with Gleb's idea that "zapping stale shadow pages
>> (and uses lock break technique)", after some discussion, we thought "only zap
>> shadow pages that are reachable from the slot's rmap" is better, that is this
>> patchset does.
>> (https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/4/23/73)
>>
> But this is not what the patch is doing. Close, but not the same :)

Okay. :)

> Instead of zapping shadow pages reachable from slot's rmap the patch
> does kvm_unmap_rmapp() which drop all spte without zapping shadow pages.
> That is why you need special code to re-init lpage_info. What I proposed
> was to call zap_page() on all shadow pages reachable from rmap. This
> will take care of lpage_info counters. Does this make sense?

Unfortunately, no! We still need to care lpage_info. lpage_info is used
to count the number of guest page tables in the memslot.

For example, there is a memslot:
memslot[0].based_gfn = 0, memslot[0].npages = 100,

and there is a shadow page:
sp->role.direct =0, sp->role.level = 4, sp->gfn = 10.

this sp is counted in the memslot[0] but it can not be found by walking
memslot[0]->rmap since there is no last mapping in this shadow page.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/