Re: [PATCH v5 6/7] sched: consider runnable load average inmove_tasks

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Mon, May 06, 2013 at 01:53:44AM -0700, Paul Turner wrote:
> On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 6:45 PM, Alex Shi <alex.shi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Except using runnable load average in background, move_tasks is also
> > the key functions in load balance. We need consider the runnable load
> > average in it in order to the apple to apple load comparison.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  kernel/sched/fair.c | 8 +++++++-
> >  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> > index 0bf88e8..790e23d 100644
> > --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> > +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> > @@ -3966,6 +3966,12 @@ static unsigned long task_h_load(struct task_struct *p);
> >
> >  static const unsigned int sched_nr_migrate_break = 32;
> >
> > +static unsigned long task_h_load_avg(struct task_struct *p)
> > +{
> > +       return div_u64(task_h_load(p) * (u64)p->se.avg.runnable_avg_sum,
> > +                       p->se.avg.runnable_avg_period + 1);
> 
> Similarly, I think you also want to at least include blocked_load_avg here.

I'm puzzled, this is an entity weight. Entity's don't have blocked_load_avg.

The purpose here is to compute the amount of weight that's being moved by this
task; to subtract from the imbalance.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/