Re: [PATCH 2/2] lockdep: check that no locks held at freeze time

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Monday, May 06, 2013 12:33:07 PM Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> On Mon, May 06, 2013 at 12:30:19PM -0700, Colin Cross wrote:
> > > I don't care about %current change, especially given that it's a debug
> > > interface but that really should be a separate patch, so please split
> > > it out if you want it (and I think we want it).
> > 
> > The current change was requested by akpm and was part of the original
> > patch.  Is it really worth confusing the history of this patch even
> > more, applying it the first time, reverting it, and then applying it
> > again in two parts?
> 
> I don't know.  The patch seems confusing to me.  It really is about
> adding single lockdep annotation but comes with other changes.  I
> don't think it's a big deal either way but at least we wouldn't be
> having this %current vs. @tsk conversation which is mostly irrelevant
> to the actual proposed change, right?  It really should have been a
> separate patch from the beginning.  Just refer to the original commit
> and explain what happened?

Yeah.  I'd prefer that very much.

Thanks,
Rafael


-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/