[ 089/115] NFSv4: Handle NFS4ERR_DELAY and NFS4ERR_GRACE in nfs4_lock_delegation_recall

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

3.9-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@xxxxxxxxxx>

commit dbb21c25a35a71baf413f5176f028ee11b88cfbc upstream.

A server shouldn't normally return NFS4ERR_GRACE if the client holds a
delegation, since no conflicting lock reclaims can be granted, however
the spec does not require the server to grant the lock in this
instance.

Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

---
 fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c |    6 ++++++
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

--- a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
@@ -5025,6 +5025,12 @@ int nfs4_lock_delegation_recall(struct n
 				nfs4_schedule_stateid_recovery(server, state);
 				err = 0;
 				goto out;
+			case -NFS4ERR_DELAY:
+			case -NFS4ERR_GRACE:
+				set_bit(NFS_DELEGATED_STATE, &state->flags);
+				ssleep(1);
+				err = -EAGAIN;
+				goto out;
 			case -ENOMEM:
 			case -NFS4ERR_DENIED:
 				/* kill_proc(fl->fl_pid, SIGLOST, 1); */


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/