[ 090/115] NFSv4: Handle NFS4ERR_DELAY and NFS4ERR_GRACE in nfs4_open_delegation_recall
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Date: Mon May 06 2013 - 16:54:31 EST
3.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@xxxxxxxxxx>
commit 8b6cc4d6f841d31f72fe7478453759166d366274 upstream.
A server shouldn't normally return NFS4ERR_GRACE if the client holds a
delegation, since no conflicting lock reclaims can be granted, however
the spec does not require the server to grant the open in this
instance
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
--- a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
@@ -1380,6 +1380,12 @@ int nfs4_open_delegation_recall(struct n
case -ENOMEM:
err = 0;
goto out;
+ case -NFS4ERR_DELAY:
+ case -NFS4ERR_GRACE:
+ set_bit(NFS_DELEGATED_STATE, &state->flags);
+ ssleep(1);
+ err = -EAGAIN;
+ goto out;
}
set_bit(NFS_DELEGATED_STATE, &state->flags);
err = nfs4_handle_exception(server, err, &exception);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/