Re: [PATCH 1/2] freezer: add unsafe versions of freezable helpers

[Tejun Heo]

Hello, Linus.

On Mon, May 06, 2013 at 02:58:31PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Quite frankly, is it worth resurrecting these patches at all?
> 
> The only things it actually complained about are not worth the pain
> fixing and are getting explicitly not warned about - is there any
> reason to believe the patches are worth maintaining and the extra
> complexity is worth it?

It might not be too useful for nfs but Colin has a patchset spreading
the use of the freezable schedules in a number of places in an attempt
to reduce freeze latency for android, which includes introducing a lot
of schedule_*_freezable() constructs, so I think we need these
warnings one way or the other so that we don't end up with more
problems like nfs currently has.

Thakns.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/