Re: [PATCH V2 1/2] tps6507x-ts: Add DT support
From: Prabhakar Lad
Date: Tue May 07 2013 - 01:41:52 EST
Hi Manish,
Thanks for the patch, below are few nits.
On Sat, May 4, 2013 at 4:42 PM, Vishwanathrao Badarkhe, Manish
<manishv.b@xxxxxx> wrote:
> Add device tree based support for TI's tps6507x touchscreen.
[Snip]
> +- tsc: This node specifies touch screen data.
> + ti,poll_period : Time at which touch input is getting sampled in ms.
> + ti,min_pressure: Minimum pressure value to trigger touch.
For devicetree properties '-' is preferred over '_'.
> + ti,vref : voltage reference for ADC.
> + 0: Reference voltage for ADC is disabled.
> + 1: Reference voltage for ADC is enabled.
>
> Regulator Optional properties:
> - defdcdc_default: It's property of DCDC2 and DCDC3 regulators.
> @@ -30,6 +40,14 @@ Regulator Optional properties:
> 1: If defdcdc pin of DCDC2/DCDC3 is driven HIGH.
> If this property is not defined, it defaults to 0 (not enabled).
>
> +Touchscreen Optional properties:
> +- ti,vendor : Touchscreen vendor id to poppulate
> + in sysclass interface.
> +- ti,product: Touchscreen product id to poppulate
> + in sysclass interface.
> +- ti,version: Touchscreen version id to poppulate
> + in sysclass interface.
> +
s/poppulate/populate
> Example:
>
> pmu: tps6507x@48 {
> @@ -88,4 +106,12 @@ Example:
> };
> };
>
> + tsc {
> + ti,poll_period = <30>;
> + ti,min_pressure = <0x30>;
> + ti,vref = <0>;
> + ti,vendor = <0>;
> + ti,product = <65070>;
> + ti,version = <0x100>;
> + };
> };
> diff --git a/drivers/input/touchscreen/tps6507x-ts.c b/drivers/input/touchscreen/tps6507x-ts.c
> index 65e0f9a..d5433d0 100644
> --- a/drivers/input/touchscreen/tps6507x-ts.c
> +++ b/drivers/input/touchscreen/tps6507x-ts.c
> @@ -21,6 +21,8 @@
> #include <linux/mfd/tps6507x.h>
> #include <linux/input/tps6507x-ts.h>
> #include <linux/delay.h>
> +#include <linux/of.h>
> +#include <linux/of_device.h>
>
> #define TSC_DEFAULT_POLL_PERIOD 30 /* ms */
> #define TPS_DEFAULT_MIN_PRESSURE 0x30
> @@ -231,36 +233,83 @@ done:
> ret = tps6507x_adc_standby(tsc);
> }
>
> +static int tsc_init_data(struct tps6507x_dev *tps6507x_dev,
> + struct input_dev *input_dev)
> +{
> + struct device_node *node = tps6507x_dev->dev->of_node;
> + struct tps6507x_board *tps_board =
> + (struct tps6507x_board *)tps6507x_dev->dev->platform_data;
> + struct touchscreen_init_data *init_data = NULL;
> + u32 val32;
> + int err;
> +
> + if (node)
> + node = of_find_node_by_name(node, "tsc");
> + if (tps_board)
> + init_data = tps_board->tps6507x_ts_init_data;
> +
> + if (init_data) {
> + tps6507x_dev->ts->poll_period = init_data->poll_period;
> + tps6507x_dev->ts->min_pressure = init_data->min_pressure;
> + tps6507x_dev->ts->vref = init_data->vref;
> + input_dev->id.vendor = init_data->vendor;
> + input_dev->id.product = init_data->product;
> + input_dev->id.version = init_data->version;
> + } else if (node) {
> + err = of_property_read_u32(node, "ti,poll_period", &val32);
why not pass tps6507x_dev->ts->poll_period instead of val32 and similarly
below that would avoid else case.
> + if (err < 0)
> + goto error_ret;
> + else
> + tps6507x_dev->ts->poll_period = val32;
> +
> + err = of_property_read_u32(node, "ti,min_pressure", &val32);
> + if (err < 0)
> + goto error_ret;
> + else
> + tps6507x_dev->ts->min_pressure = val32;
> +
> + err = of_property_read_u32(node, "ti,vref", &val32);
> + if (err < 0)
> + goto error_ret;
> + else
> + tps6507x_dev->ts->vref = val32;
> +
> + err = of_property_read_u32(node, "ti,vendor", &val32);
> + if (err < 0)
> + goto error_ret;
> + else
> + input_dev->id.vendor = val32;
> +
> + err = of_property_read_u32(node, "ti,product", &val32);
> + if (err < 0)
> + goto error_ret;
> + else
> + input_dev->id.product = val32;
> +
> + err = of_property_read_u32(node, "ti,version", &val32);
> + if (err < 0)
> + goto error_ret;
> + else
> + input_dev->id.version = val32;
> + } else {
> + err = -EINVAL;
> + goto error_ret;
> + }
you can move this check at the top when both are NULL.
Regards,
--Prabhakar Lad
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/